This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Community: Knowledge & Support

Welcome to the world's leading forum on Multiple Sclerosis research, support, and knowledge. For over 10 years, This is MS has provided an unbiased community dedicated to Multiple Sclerosis patients, caregivers, and affected loved ones.
It is currently Fri May 24, 2013 3:42 pm


All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 5:17 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:00 pm
Posts: 2692
Location: Sydney, Australia
simone wrote:
I thought an MRV was the first step then doppler . Still new to this.
If anything, the doppler is the first, as it primarily identifies that there IS a problem. The MRV can be used for this also, but it excels further at identifying the actual location of a problem. Doppler is more limited when it comes to areas behind bone (such as your skull) or seeing through air filled cavities (such as your lungs)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 1:26 pm 
Offline
Family Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 67
Location: Berkeley, CA
Re: Cure Or Bust's post: I'm surprised to hear that doppler is the first test to have. There seems to be a certain amount of confusion and no real clear approach to the testing we should get.

It would be extremely valuable if we can get discussion and agreement going here as to the procedures and protocols that should be followed to get reliable testing and readings. It feels to me that we are all over the place on this.

If I am going to pay upward of $3,000+ just to get an MRV where I live, then the procedures should be uniform so that I know I am asking for the best I can expect to get. It doesn't further our cause to be tossing money in a scattershot fashion.

We have a good solid cause in all the CCSVI research. This is a tremendous grass roots effort that is continuing to generate interest worldwide. We all want to participate. We all want to take action now. I think our action needs to be focused to better serve CCSVI's future.

Can we establish that doppler with Zamboni's or Simka's protocol is the first proper step or is MRV the first step. If I remember correctly, Dake switched from doppler to MRV because he could not use Zamboni's protocol without the same type of machine.

As per Simone's post, having a list of willing IRs and their locations would be another step to furthering accurate and comparable results. We need docs that are willing to learn the protocols and participate in the findings. Otherwise, it seems to me, we could end up with potentially lots of false negatives, unverifiable results and wasted money.

Questions:

1. Doppler as first step: What kind of machine is needed? Whose protocol?

2. MRV as first step: Any protocol that should be followed?

3. Do we need both doppler & MRV?

4. Is venography third step? Should venography be performed by the surgeon just prior to angio or stents?

5. List of willing IR's and locations

6. How can our data make a valuable contribution to further CCSVI?


This makes sense to me. What about you.

Feedback?

_________________
Kat


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 6:26 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 759
Location: Paignton, Devon, UK
jean-la-grenouille wrote:
I agree with the former threads. The venous problem isnt "a simple narrowing that can be enlarged", the venous problem is wide (especially in progressives MS) and presently difficult to solve.

I'm french and can easily speak to Dr Franceschi. He is very careful (that's why he didn't send me to another Dr to be operated "as soon as possible"). I try inclined bed therapy (as he advised me to do), look for any improvement, then, something could be done.

We have to be patient and go on promoting CCSVI, because it is the most important discovery regarding MS we have ever seen.

Jean


Have you kept up with Inclined bed therapy and if so can you provide us with an update on your progress?

_________________
Find us on Facebook.com/InclinedBedTherapy
IBT website: http://inclinedbedtherapy.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Received another opinion, and off to NIH tomorrow

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2 ]

marcstck

21

2640

Sun Nov 08, 2009 6:18 pm

cheerleader View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Possible CCSVI without MS diagnosis?

Annbanan

8

1497

Sun Jul 25, 2010 12:07 pm

1eye View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. CCSVI without MS diagnosis?

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2, 3 ]

seabea

30

1415

Mon May 07, 2012 12:19 pm

Cece View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. What if you presented with CCSVI without an MS diagnosis?

rssugg

4

1166

Wed May 12, 2010 3:59 am

rssugg View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Diagnosis Code for CCSVI

IHateMS

6

2191

Mon Aug 23, 2010 8:19 pm

Henry_Jacobs View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: