This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Community: Knowledge & Support

Welcome to the world's leading forum on Multiple Sclerosis research, support, and knowledge. For over 10 years, This is MS has provided an unbiased community dedicated to Multiple Sclerosis patients, caregivers, and affected loved ones.
It is currently Thu May 23, 2013 8:27 pm


All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 5:59 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 740
Location: Greece
It seems that many of us have already undergone mrv and doppler testing which came out "negative". On the other hand others found blockage inside veins otherwise physiological. But this was only possible with a venography which i think is invasive. And from what i can understand it s only logical to spot membranes or other defects inside the veins once you get in there. MRV shows the outside and doppler can spot reflux only under a trained eye.This is why i strongly believe that one has to be examined by CCSVI experts so to speak, or wait until this runs under a worlwide official protocol somehow. Yeah, right.

My guess is that Italy and Poland are the places to get tested so far. They are convinced that ccsvi is the problem and they will do everything to locate it. And by excluding Italy, Poland is whats left :( Dr Simka must have gone crazy...

Am i wrong? I dont want to get a false negative result. As someone in here already said i d accept it only from a doctor who really knows what he is doing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 1:21 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 218
Location: Hungary
youre right!

what i used to tell newbies:
the radiologist mustknow what to look for!
a tech guy eating his sandwiches wont find anything...
only if you have something really messed up with your veins

alex


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Defining Terminolgy
PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 1:27 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 3:00 pm
Posts: 1054
Location: Oxfordshire, England
MRV is Magnetic Resonance Venography. It is not invasive but a contrast medium (injection into a vein) is used, sometimes, to give better definition of the blood vessel. A radiologist (specialist doctor) would be able to tell you if they have the experience to view neck and trunk veins on an MRV.

Colour Doppler Ultrasound is not usually used on the neck veins so a sonograher (operator) will usually need training and/or practise to get accurate results. See Prof Zamboni's comments on this.

If pwMS have to travel to two or maybe five centres worldwide, its going to take ages for the CCSVI and MS to become accepted. If a radiologist is prepared to study the papers with an open mind then good results should be obtained. Getting a local MRV helps the CCSVI cause, if you can find an open minded radiologist in Greece.

MarkW

_________________
Mark Walker - Oxfordshire, England. Registered Pharmacist (UK). 10 years of study around MS.
Mark's CCSVI Report 7-Mar-11:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/8359854/MS-experts-in-Britain-have-to-open-their-minds.html


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 4:40 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:00 pm
Posts: 2692
Location: Sydney, Australia
costumenastional wrote:
MRV shows the outside and doppler can spot reflux only under a trained eye
Flow quantification can also be attained with an MRV, it is not the realm of doppler only.

costumenastional wrote:
...or wait until this runs under a worldwide official protocol somehow. Yeah, right.
Dr Haake has proposed a protocol, the problem is finding a centre capable and willing to perform it. If I am reading it right, it includes flow measurements as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 7:05 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 421
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Cos,

I had dopplers in Italy, venogram in Australia and dopplers, MRV and venogram in Poland, all within 3 months. The results were all different. The venogram in Poland was relied upon for my treatment and they stented a jugular valve.

This stuff is in its infancy. People are doing the best they can under the circumstances. However, it's going to take a while for a recognised testing and treatment path to be established.

I don't think I'm alone - others have had strange results, too. I think we need to keep going with trial and error - but not to get our hopes too high, nor on the other hand, get too despondent.

Phil


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 10:39 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 3:00 pm
Posts: 1155
Location: Riverside, CA
Brainteaser wrote:
Cos,

I had dopplers in Italy, venogram in Australia and dopplers, MRV and venogram in Poland, all within 3 months. The results were all different. The venogram in Poland was relied upon for my treatment and they stented a jugular valve.

This stuff is in its infancy. People are doing the best they can under the circumstances. However, it's going to take a while for a recognised testing and treatment path to be established.

I don't think I'm alone - others have had strange results, too. I think we need to keep going with trial and error - but not to get our hopes too high, nor on the other hand, get too despondent.

Phil


I did a post awhile back on OB/GYN's (there was a paper), and the trouble they have getting consistent results on fetal ultrasounds, and how so many MD's (not your local test facility) do these for a living and aren't even operating the machines correctly.

Think about that, like my wife, she's had three so far in her pregnancy by the best damn OB/GYN on the planet (he's had first hands on my first two, and now for our third), so gee that's like MILLIONS and MILLIONS of ultrasounds a year on just pregnant women, I do the math in my head, and hope that more than a couple thousand are competent for this in the very near future. Sorry cant find the post where I posted the paper, it was a real eye opener as to the shortcomings in the system, specific to ultrasound.

Mark.

_________________
RRMS Dx'd 2007, first episode 2004. Bilateral stent placement, 3 on left, 1 stent on right, at Stanford August 2009. Watch my operation video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwc6QlLVtko, Virtually symptom free since, no relap


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Brief doppler, no MRV, then venography?

tzootsi

8

1702

Tue Jan 26, 2010 11:54 pm

CureIous View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Venography

AJWANTSACURE

0

908

Sat Jan 23, 2010 4:16 am

AJWANTSACURE View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. venography etc

nico

1

815

Thu Mar 04, 2010 12:19 am

costumenastional View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. venography

sbr487

0

737

Tue Oct 05, 2010 10:47 am

sbr487 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Need advice RE: venography

CureIt

12

1704

Tue Sep 28, 2010 7:43 pm

garyak View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: