I am still waiting to hear back from Dr Simka or Dr Ludyga regarding my balloon angiogram preformed on the 13th Jan.
Viewing the CD of the venogram it seems the ballooning carried out was not enough to have been effective in keeping the stenosis open
And I don't understand for this reason why a stent was not considered at the time
I have put the video of the balloon angiogram (before/after) on u tube.
And I think it's clear to see there is still a problem.
I am just trying to find out why they did not use a stent ?
Was the stenosis in a place where they cant use stents ?
Did I sign something saying I did not want a stent ?
Do they think it could open on its own after being streched by balloon ?
Will they expect me to pay for the full operation again ?
I will let you know what they say