This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Community: Knowledge & Support

Welcome to the world's leading forum on Multiple Sclerosis research, support, and knowledge. For over 10 years, This is MS has provided an unbiased community dedicated to Multiple Sclerosis patients, caregivers, and affected loved ones.
It is currently Sun May 19, 2013 8:18 am


All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 7:46 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 1148
Location: Northern Ontario, Canada
could not having CCSVI mean that you don't have MS?

_________________
Had ms for over 19 years now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 8:51 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 690
It could but the imaging would have to be done by someone who knows this stuff. There are a lot of false negatives being handed out by people who dont follow the protocols correctly.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 9:10 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 3:00 pm
Posts: 4676
Location: southern California
Hey Robbie...
nice to see your pic. Hope you're doing OK in the frozen tundra...how's the lake looking?

We just don't really know how may MSers are going to have CCSVI, preliminary numbers look around 90%, but having the Jacobs research numbers soon may help elucidate the pic. There may be a subset of folks with MS and no CCSVI...more research will tell.
cheer

_________________
Husband dx RRMS 3/07
dx dual jugular vein stenosis (CCSVI) 4/09
dual stents placed 5/09
CCSVI in MS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 9:33 am 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 1419
Location: California
I would just like to add that my MRV and my Doppler were not that clear when it came to CCSVI. Only a subtle "might be" problem was seen, when I had the venogram the problem was very obvious and there was no question about my left jugular being occluded.
So even if something looks normal there may be serious issues still.
I hope they take this into consideration in the studies


Last edited by LR1234 on Fri Jan 22, 2010 12:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 9:35 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 1148
Location: Northern Ontario, Canada
Hi Cheer i think i'd rather have our weather than yours right now and i mean for now only (winter sucks) The reason i asked this question is i remember the number being mentioned in the beginning was 100 % so i thought this might be a good way to know if you have ms or not. Maybe in the future it will be. For anyone with ms you have got to be curious as hell to see if you have CCSVI or not.I asked Bromley this on the main board after he insulted you but i guess i am not worthy of his reply.

_________________
Had ms for over 19 years now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 10:10 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 1148
Location: Northern Ontario, Canada
Hi LR1234 would you say then that having an MRV done by a person who knows what to look for wouldn't be enough to tell you if you had CCSVI or not
Quote:
MRV and my Doppler were not that clear when it came to CCSVI.

_________________
Had ms for over 19 years now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 11:06 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 3:00 pm
Posts: 4676
Location: southern California
robbie wrote:
Hi Cheer i think i'd rather have our weather than yours right now and i mean for now only (winter sucks) The reason i asked this question is i remember the number being mentioned in the beginning was 100 % so i thought this might be a good way to know if you have ms or not. Maybe in the future it will be. For anyone with ms you have got to be curious as hell to see if you have CCSVI or not.I asked Bromley this on the main board after he insulted you but i guess i am not worthy of his reply.


You're right, Robbie- Dr. Zamboni found CCSVI in 100% of the MS patients he tested in that first paper. This could be because he only used patients who were definitely clinically defined MS, or because his doppler protocol is so specific (we still can't find places to do the transcranial doppler!) or just a fluke. I know Dr. Dake was seeing close to 95% in self-referred MS patients, and there have been reports of negatives in MS patients. I think the Jacobs research will shed more light.
Yeah, bromley likes to pop in and make his snide proclamations and then go away again. Whatever. thanks for being chivalrous :)
I like your summers much more than LA's, that's for sure-
cheer

_________________
Husband dx RRMS 3/07
dx dual jugular vein stenosis (CCSVI) 4/09
dual stents placed 5/09
CCSVI in MS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 11:51 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 478
Location: Brussels, Capital of Europe
I have the problem but then the other way around. I was diagnosed with RR-MS 6 years ago. So you would expect me to have CCSVI. I met prof. Zamboni in November and indeed he diagnosed me with CCSVI Pattern C (stenosis in both jugular veins) using the echo-Doppler measurement (=speed/flow).

This week an angiography was made of my jugular veins in a local hospital. Both veins were found to be normal/quasi-normal. The outcome was a big disappointment for me.

Does anyone here know about the possibilities/impossibilities of using angiography as an instrument for diagnosis of CCSVI? For instance is valve malformation that could give rise to reflux visible in all cases? I read about echo-Doppler (=mainly speed/flow) and MRV according to the Haacke protocol but have not found angiography for diagnosis of CCSVI.

Thanks for all info you can give.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 1:09 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 3:00 pm
Posts: 1273
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
I've seen several posts from people who have been imaged and no CCSVI discovered, like Leonard !! This scares me. I have put so much hope into CCSVI that if I get a negative scan I will be devastated. But I am going to see a neuroradiologist Feb 8. His nurse told me that they could order a scan for me. But since I will be the first in my city (that I know of) to be tested for CCSVI, what are the chances for a false negative ? It is one thing to be a pioneer and be successful, but a whole other thing to be a pioneer and be shot down. Unfortunately I have a whole lot emotionally invested in this.

ozarkcanoer


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 1:12 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 3:00 pm
Posts: 899
Also Robbie,
If you do have CCSVI, you might still be told you don't have MS, which is what may be happening with my husband....
Bromley who? (pompous and arse come to mind).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 8:23 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:00 pm
Posts: 2684
Location: Sydney, Australia
cheerleader wrote:
....or because his doppler protocol is so specific (we still can't find places to do the transcranial doppler!) or just a fluke...
If you are looking for a sonographer that is capable of performing TCD (the main issue most have with Zamboni's protocol), I really suggest you speak to someone who deals specifically with Stroke. They do ultrasound of the cranium as standard practice.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 2:02 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 478
Location: Brussels, Capital of Europe
Dear all,

The facts in my posting here above were not complete. In fact, it appears there is a narrowing of the dominant left jugular vein. As soon as I know more, I will let you know.

Leonard


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. 2011 CCSVI Symposium Videos--a great CCSVI primer

Anonymoose

0

273

Thu Jan 17, 2013 10:53 am

Anonymoose View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. CCSVI "CCSVI tracking project" french language !

Fred1208

2

1100

Thu May 06, 2010 7:27 am

Fred1208 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. CCSVI TESTING / TESTS CCSVI *CANADA*

SickButHappy

2

2291

Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:48 am

eveable View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. CCSVI 101--a new video by Dr. Siskin from CCSVI Alliance

cheerleader

4

1367

Tue Aug 23, 2011 9:16 am

cheerleader View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. BIG ON CCSVI, Dr Tom Gilhooly talks about CCSVI and the LDN

GuRu

3

1998

Tue May 18, 2010 2:58 pm

silverbirch View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: