This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Community: Knowledge & Support

Welcome to the world's leading forum on Multiple Sclerosis research, support, and knowledge. For over 10 years, This is MS has provided an unbiased community dedicated to Multiple Sclerosis patients, caregivers, and affected loved ones.
It is currently Fri May 24, 2013 3:28 pm


All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 9:20 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 3:00 pm
Posts: 1610
Oh crap. Thanks for the link Cheer. I didn't expect this one to be incredibly effective, but I was hoping it would at least offer some benefit in SPMS.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 2:10 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 3:00 pm
Posts: 228
Location: Argentina
It didn't meet its secondary endpoints also.

At least it has no secondary effects :lol:

But, really, very sad indeed.

Viewing the scale of these failures one has to wonder about the whole process of developing drugs. I mean, dirucotide had at least 10 years of developing and nobody saw this massive failure coming?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 4:43 pm 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 4:00 pm
Posts: 522
Location: Germany
Another report about the fail of phase-III. It says all ongoing studies with dirucotide will be discontinued :(.
http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsN ... 728?rpc=44

--Frank

_________________
Treatment: CCSVI both IJV ballooned 09/2010, No DMDs, Tysabri on hold after 24 Infusions, after LDN, ABX Wheldon Regime for 1 year.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 5:40 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2008 4:00 pm
Posts: 1323
1 year ago in a galaxy far far away:



BioMS/Lilly's dirucotide shows promise in Phase II/III MS study
PARIS, Aug 14,2008 (APM) -

The Canadian biotech BioMS Medical announced on Wednesday early positive findings of a Phase II/III study of dirucotide (MBP8298) in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (MS).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 07, 2009 12:48 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 3:00 pm
Posts: 228
Location: Argentina
http://neuropipeline.com/?p=98

Quote:
I expounded more on the reasons that I felt the Phase III would fail at seekingalpha (see link above). Most importantly, the decision to proceed to expensive Phase III testing (1100 patients in 2 studies) was done prematurely based entirely on a very small study of 32 patients, further split into 20 patients with HLA-DR2 or DR4. These 20 patients were further split into 14 SPMS and 6 PPMS patients, a ridiculously small number of patients to try to analyze. No attempt was made to determine if every 6 month dosing was best by doing a larger and more controlled phase II looking at other doses. Maybe the medicine would have worked with monthly dosing. Second, the mechanism of action — tolerance induction — is unlikely as the MINDSET RRMS study failed to show an effect on inflammation, much more suscetible to tolerance induction than the degeneration of SPMS. I may have felt different about the prospects if a plausible MOA was advanced and supported by evidence. An additional reason I may not have mentioned is that 2 years may have been too short for the study.

As long as I’m rambling, I’ll add my two cents about small companies in Biotech and the decisions to proceed to phase III. BioMS could not have proceeded as far as they did without either a partnership, private equity or a second public offering. They rightly calculated that a product just starting Phase III would have more value than one that just has a 20 patient phase II. Initiating the MAESTRO studies allowed them to gain a reasonably good deal with Lilly, a company that could easily spare 97 million (87 + 10 milestone at 200 patient review) to have a shot at a 1 - 2 billion dollar a year drug. Thus, BioMS had nothing to lose by rushing the drug along. A larger company would have done a larger phase II forst and then decide whether to advance the drug to expensive phase III studies or just let the agent die. BioMS, with one drug, could not afford to let the drug die in Phase II. I’m going to keep this in mind when I look at other small companies that may have rushed a product along.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 07, 2009 3:13 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 3:00 pm
Posts: 1610
Thanks for that Fernando, that sounds like exactly what's going on right now with daclizumab moving to phase 3 while a large phase 2b trial is still recruiting.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Treosulfan for SPMS

bromley

1

1200

Mon Apr 23, 2007 6:22 am

dignan View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. drug for spms

scorpion

1

1210

Thu Aug 27, 2009 5:55 pm

carolew View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Trialresults IVIG in SPMS and PPMS

Frank

0

1309

Tue Sep 02, 2008 5:10 am

Frank View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. EGCG trial for SPMS and PPMS

Frank

1

1464

Sun Aug 09, 2009 6:22 pm

RuSmolikova View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. MBP 8298 for SPMS Phase III Trial in Canada

Chilcotin

0

1834

Fri Mar 11, 2005 1:24 am

Chilcotin View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: