scorpion, i am not a ccsvi fanatic. and i am not an anti-ccsvi fanatic. i am a moderator.
i invited mirry to read ccsvi to stay up with the current news. reading our forums will inform re the array of viewpoints involved.
in the same vein, reading about supplements will inform them of the various approaches out there, even though i don't personally agree with all the nutrition concepts out there.
if there's one thing i've learned in my years as a TIMS member, is that people will only listen to you if they want to. arguing with people that are passionate about ccsvi is a waste of your valuable energy. the skeptics don't argue with you, because they agree and don't feel a need to post on the subject.
you'll notice, i hope, that you don't find me arguing with you about CCSVI. i'm just tired of the nastiness.
in my view you are carrying forward old arguments with established members into new territory with an unsuspecting new member. doing so is unworthy of you.
odd sx? no dx? check w/ dietitian
DRI=MINIMUM eg bit.ly/1vgQclQ
99% don't meet these. meds/lifestyle can affect levels
status can be low in ms & other cond'ns
'but my results are normal'. typical panels don't test all
deficits occur in 'normal' range