This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Community: Knowledge & Support

Welcome to the world's leading forum on Multiple Sclerosis research, support, and knowledge. For over 10 years, This is MS has provided an unbiased community dedicated to Multiple Sclerosis patients, caregivers, and affected loved ones.
It is currently Thu May 23, 2013 7:11 am


All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 65 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Cladrabine - Movectro
PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2011 1:44 am 
Offline
Getting to Know You...
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 16
Location: Australia
Hi all,
is any one on Cladrabine, i am thinking swap from copaxone to C but need more information.please help

take care
becia


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2011 5:04 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 356
Location: Melbourne, Australia
cladribine is a cancer (leukemia) drug, which is sold under brand name "litak" to the leukemia market, and under brand name "movectro" to the MS market.

It's only approved for use in Australia and Russia. It was rejected in Europe and the USA due to it's safety profile (patients on Cladribine developed cancer during the trial, whilst those not on cladribine did not develop cancer).

My neuro has also recommended I take one of the new oral MS drugs...though I have not been relapsing and my health has not been in decline.

It really depends upon your level of decline as to whether you'd even consider cladribine. There are certainly safer treatments available (such as CCSVI treatment).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2011 6:10 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 3:00 pm
Posts: 1889
Becia,

You asked about Cladribine [please note CCSVI is not safe (couple of deaths) and has not gone through proper trials]. So sticking to your query about Cladribine, below is some information on all five MS oral drugs. Information from a Professor of Neurology - see MS Research Blog website.

Hope the info helps.

Ian



I keep getting asked what is the most efficacious oral DMT? The following table is a summary of the headline results of the phase 3 studies for the 5 oral DMTs:


Reduction in Annual Relapse Rate first. Reduction in Disability Progression second.



1. BG12 53% 38%
2. Cladribine 58% 33%
3. Fingolimod 54% 30%
4. Laquinimod 23% 36%
5. Teriflunomide 32% 30%

Please remember that all agents are associated with particular side-effects and other attributes; hence the decision on which one is more appropriate for a particular person will require some careful thought. Individualised Medicine!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2011 12:22 pm 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 3:00 pm
Posts: 6063
..


Last edited by Lyon on Wed Jun 22, 2011 4:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2011 8:08 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 3:00 pm
Posts: 1610
That is handy info Bromley, thanks. I hadn't twigged that BG12 was that good compared with gilenya.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: minocycline
PostPosted: Tue May 31, 2011 2:06 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 356
Location: Melbourne, Australia
any figures for minocycline? That's an oral drug which can be used to treat MS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 31, 2011 6:49 pm 
Offline
Getting to Know You...
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 16
Location: Australia
thanks to all of you for the information.

hwebb,
i have done liberation treatment last year in Poland, got stent in left jugular and no improvements at all.


i got 2 options tysabri or cladrabine. i tryed all what is on the market. is so difficult decision because of PML side effect. Cladrabine is new and no many people on it. i need opinion from people on cladrabine.
thank you so much for your replays.

cheers
Becia


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 31, 2011 10:01 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 4:00 pm
Posts: 367
Would love to see percentages of the non-orals too. Have always thought we need a sabermeteric analysis of treatments. For you non North Americans ;) - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabermetrics


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 7:37 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 3:00 pm
Posts: 2111
Location: London, ON, Canada
Quote:
please note CCSVI is not safe (couple of deaths) and has not gone through proper trials


You forgot to mention another surgical procedure for MS, stem cell transplantation. It currently has a 1/20 mortality rate.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: stem cell
PostPosted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 2:26 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 356
Location: Melbourne, Australia
that's interesting about the stem cell treatment. The neuro's here in Australia are plugging it (but only for patients fitting certain criteria). I thought the neuro's claimed it had a 1 in 100 mortality rate.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: stem cell
PostPosted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 2:35 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 3:00 pm
Posts: 2111
Location: London, ON, Canada
hwebb wrote:
that's interesting about the stem cell treatment. The neuro's here in Australia are plugging it (but only for patients fitting certain criteria). I thought the neuro's claimed it had a 1 in 100 mortality rate.


Believe it depends on the procedure and how much they wipe out your immune system.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: stem cell
PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 8:07 am 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 3:00 pm
Posts: 6063
..


Last edited by Lyon on Wed Jun 22, 2011 4:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: stem cell
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 6:03 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 3:00 pm
Posts: 2111
Location: London, ON, Canada
Quote:
Your conviction is seeming less and less certain with time Harry. Is there REALLY some reason to believe that there is a 1 in 20 mortality rate in ANY of the procedures or not?


Bob,

Some people think that I make these numbers up and post them for excitement. That 1/20 number came from an article on SCT I read very recently on the net. Now being that my memory isn't what it used to be, I have to try and go back and find what forum I read about it. I was quite surprised about the very high rate but like I said, I don't make these up.

Harry


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 8:23 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 3:00 pm
Posts: 4676
Location: southern California
Here's a long range study with 5% overall mortality at 100 days, but the percentage grows with time. Honestly, from what I could find, the percentages on mortality are around 2-3% for MS at 100 days...higher for other conditions. Cardiotoxicity isn't great, either, and leads to mortality further down the road. Harry's larger point is well taken.

http://neurologiayneurocirugia.com/atta ... logica.pdf
Quote:
Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for autoimmune diseases: an observational study on 12 years’ experience from the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Working Party on Autoimmune Diseases

...the 100-day transplant-related mortality was 5% (95% CI: 3–7%). The causes of death are summarized in Table 3. At the time of analysis (December 2007), 789 patients were alive and 111 had died: 43 (38.7%) from their original disease and 59 (53.1%) from transplant-related causes (Table 3). Infections (45.7%) were the leading cause of transplant-related mortality. Death due to cardiac toxicity (8.4%) was not related to a specific type of conditioning. As shown in Table 4A, the 100-day transplant-related mortality was 2% for MS, 6% for SSc, 1% for RA, 11% for SLE, 11% for JIA and 8% for HIC, with a statistical difference depending on type of autoimmune disease (P< 0.001).


Fact check: Angioplasty has not killed anyone treated for CCSVI. The two tragic deaths reported were due to after procedural blood thinning... one a stroke tied to coumadin (which is a risk with that drug) and one a clot developed due to a lack of blood thinning and death due to aggressive thinning. The regimen is much better now than when we started...the US doctors are using Artrixa and Pradaxa post procedure and having better results. Also, angioplasty is not well-suited to medical tourism and travel. Best to stay close to home and be part of a trial.

Life is all about mitigating risk. With MS, patients need to decide risk vs. benefit ratio. Not very easy these days....

Becia---I'm very sorry you haven't found relief yet--all best to you and I hope you get more info on Cladrabine.
cheer

_________________
Husband dx RRMS 3/07
dx dual jugular vein stenosis (CCSVI) 4/09
dual stents placed 5/09
CCSVI in MS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 8:53 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 3:00 pm
Posts: 445
Location: colorado
By the way, it's worth noting that it's not the stem cells per se that cause toxicity. The chemo that's used along side the transplantation is the most dangerous part. Thus, a stem cell transplant without chemo has a significantly better safety profile -- though admittedly I don't have any studies on hand.

Cleveland Clinic is doing a study on Mesenchymal transplant sans that messy chemo stuff: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00813969


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 65 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Merck fined AUD$75,000 for Movectro advertising

hwebb

0

1085

Tue Apr 19, 2011 3:55 am

hwebb View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Merck withdraws EU license application for Movectro

squiffy2

0

977

Thu Feb 17, 2011 8:12 am

squiffy2 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Movectro (Cladribine) withdrawn by Merck on FDA feedback

squiffy2

4

2222

Sun Jun 26, 2011 4:26 pm

brog64 View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: