Liberation wrote:
I'm not sure if I got it right, but the specialist advised against it or you? What was the reason for that?
It was me, the specialist was offering the treatment as a possibility. The reason for my hesitation, is that if they had a sample of a number of people without IBS, and a number of people with IBS, more research should be done on the difference, and only culture and add that particular bacteria. ie They obviously had no idea how it really works (or if it does). It did not seem like science to me. That was also 10-15 years ago.
Liberation wrote:
What I thought of is mainly getting some bad bacteria if things are not screened properly. That is surely is a potential risk.
I was also arguing that if they didn't know what helped, they also did not know what could hurt. Infections from things more serious than a bacteria would possibly be let through.
Liberation wrote:
To me the fact that all three MS patients' conditions improved significantly seems very promising. However, I know what we read on the internet usually do not reflect reality.
Read the wonder stories about Aimspro when it first came out; they were remarkable. Not only has it not lived up to the hype, I have tried it and it did not work for me.
As for 3 patients, I actually found it more interesting, that in their small sample size of patients, they managed to "randomly" get 3 patients who had MS. What were the odds on that? Also, the fact that they were assigned to this treatment for another complaint, opens the possibility that maybe "their MS" was related to this other condition. So if you are not showing the other condition, I would hazard a guess the treatment is possibly a stretch for you. But I would love you to prove me wrong.
Liberation wrote:
On the other hand, I feel that there is a huge risk with every available drugs, not to mention any new drug which does not have a long track record yet. Unfortunately, with MS even deciding to wait can bear a huge risk.
I understand, but at least we know a few thousand have gone before us, not 3.
Liberation wrote:
I think what someone can lose by waiting for a new approved treatment will never be regained with what he waited for. So, I think many of us just takes chance with different diets, suppliments, CCSVI treatments, stem cells, etc.
I have tried MANY off-label treatments, none of which have really shown a true result. You are preaching to the choir. Also what is too little discussed, is the hope lost waiting for a new treatment.