Opinion about MS research and NMSS

If it's on your mind and it has to do with multiple sclerosis in any way, post it here.

Opinion about MS research and NMSS

Postby finn » Fri Jun 18, 2004 4:39 am

Sorry, time to leave the board.

-finn
Last edited by finn on Sun Aug 28, 2005 9:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
finn
Contributing Author
 
Posts: 289
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: Finland

Advertisement

Re: Opinion about MS research and NMSS

Postby HarryZ » Fri Jun 18, 2004 12:12 pm

Finn,

finn wrote:Stephen Reingold of the NMSS and Henry McFarland of the NIH have both dismissed Barnett and Prineas’ work on the grounds that the disease modifying therapies work. To dismiss valid experimental data because it is inconvenient to your fondly held theories is bad science, although not surprising. The autoimmune theory of multiple sclerosis is the bedrock of many researchers livelihoods, EAE is not so much a disease, more of an industry and anti-inflammatory treatments such as the interferons are multi-million dollar products.


I couldn't agree more with your above statement. It pretty well summarizes how the established MS world of medicine operates. But like you said, it isn't surprising to have Reingold and McFarland take such a stance. The financial ramifications from Prineas and Barnett being correct in their theory would be staggering.

Harry
User avatar
HarryZ
Family Elder
 
Posts: 2450
Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 3:00 pm
Location: London, ON, Canada

Re: Opinion about MS research and NMSS

Postby willysnout1 » Fri Jun 18, 2004 3:30 pm

finn wrote:Stephen Reingold of the NMSS and Henry McFarland of the NIH have both dismissed Barnett and Prineas’ work on the grounds that the disease modifying therapies work. To dismiss valid experimental data because it is inconvenient to your fondly held theories is bad science, although not surprising. The autoimmune theory of multiple sclerosis is the bedrock of many researchers livelihoods, EAE is not so much a disease, more of an industry and anti-inflammatory treatments such as the interferons are multi-million dollar products.

Very interesting post, finn. I'd be interested to know if there are any articles that present the autoimmune theory side-by-side with its opposition. I'd also be interested to see some actual proof that the NMSS and the NIH have "dismissed" Barnett and Prineas's work. Harry does a lot of kicking and screaming and arm-waving, but it would be good to have a more sober and thorough assessment.
User avatar
willysnout1
Family Elder
 
Posts: 125
Joined: Sun May 23, 2004 3:00 pm

Re: Opinion about MS research and NMSS

Postby HarryZ » Fri Jun 18, 2004 4:35 pm

> Harry does a lot of kicking and screaming and arm-waving, but it would be good to have a more sober and thorough assessment.

Sticks and stones Willy,...sticks and stones.

Harry
User avatar
HarryZ
Family Elder
 
Posts: 2450
Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 3:00 pm
Location: London, ON, Canada

Postby finn » Sat Jun 19, 2004 7:14 am

Sorry, time to leave the board.

-finn
User avatar
finn
Contributing Author
 
Posts: 289
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: Finland


Return to General Discussion

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users