This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Community: Knowledge & Support

Welcome to the world's leading forum on Multiple Sclerosis research, support, and knowledge. For over 10 years, This is MS has provided an unbiased community dedicated to Multiple Sclerosis patients, caregivers, and affected loved ones.
It is currently Sat May 25, 2013 7:59 am


All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 10:02 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2005 3:00 pm
Posts: 428
Location: Missouri, USA
Very interesting information. See link. I would consider this to be very important.

http://www.medpagetoday.com/Neurology/MultipleSclerosis/tb/2929[/url]


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 11:11 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2005 3:00 pm
Posts: 428
Location: Missouri, USA
A statement on that site that caught my eye: "not all patients who experience a single attack will go on to develop the disease". Is there data to back that up? How many don't convert? I've had a CIS, what are my chances of not developing MS, statistically?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: A good chance, I think
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 12:05 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 1673
I don't know any statistics on the subject, but I know personally of one case: A friend from high school days (now in Wisconsin) got a diagnosis of MS the same year I did (1992). She saw a Boston doctor to confirm it. His advice? "Live as though you don't have it!" She never had another exacerbation and her Christmas card this year said that she feels "as strong as a horse."

With your history and a good diet and lifestyle, I would think your chances were as good!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 5:19 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 3:00 pm
Posts: 163
Location: Canada - Ontario - South-West
I was briefly hospitalized when I was 20. Recovered but never received a difinitive diagnosis of anything. Encephalytis was strongly suspected.

At the age of 50, after a number of different minor issues over a 3 - 4 year period MRI was used to confirm active MS.

Neuro believes that incident at age 20 was in fact the onset attack of MS. Followed by almost 30 years of dormancy. I'm kind of glad they didn't have MRI way back then. Could have put a big damper on what was 30 pretty good years.

_________________
Carpe Diem


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 8:21 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2005 3:00 pm
Posts: 428
Location: Missouri, USA
Exactly. I would have rather not known, unless it became a constant problem. :(


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Hughes and MS, diagnosing them?

Wonderfulworld

13

1985

Sun Jan 14, 2007 2:00 pm

Jill View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. IGF-1 not effective in ALS

Frank

0

835

Thu Dec 11, 2008 7:46 pm

Frank View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Placebos Are Getting More Effective

zap

10

1161

Tue Sep 08, 2009 5:37 am

fernando View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. CRABS+T Effective or Not?

VailKin

4

1051

Sat Jan 02, 2010 2:49 pm

VailKin View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Combination of two pharmaceuticals may prove effective

squiffy2

0

306

Tue Nov 27, 2012 2:35 am

squiffy2 View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: