This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Community: Knowledge & Support

Welcome to the world's leading forum on Multiple Sclerosis research, support, and knowledge. For over 10 years, This is MS has provided an unbiased community dedicated to Multiple Sclerosis patients, caregivers, and affected loved ones.
It is currently Sat May 25, 2013 9:11 pm


All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 88 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 1:38 pm 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 3:00 pm
Posts: 6063
..


Last edited by Lyon on Wed Jun 22, 2011 7:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 2:05 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 1148
Location: Northern Ontario, Canada
so can a person with severe disability have little activty on their mri. seems allot of the trials need to see that you have an active mri and how is it possible that a person with spms or ppms(same thing)does not have an active mri,

take the person that is diagnosed with ppms right from the start and now years later they are very disabled did this person get there without any inflamation that was noticable on an mri,and if it took allot of inflamaton to get to the point he's at (which i assume it did)why were there no drugs for him?
this person is someone i worked with who is now in a long term care facility.

_________________
Had ms for over 19 years now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 2:37 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 3:00 pm
Posts: 4682
Location: southern California
You've hit the nail on the head, Rob...just because there's no activity on the MRI, doesn't mean things aren't progressing.

Bob...The name of the blood test Jeff has is an ESR, Erythrocyte sedimentation rate. His GP ordered it because of all his weird petechiae and bruises....she was ruling out leukemia and vasculitis, which were negative, but this test keeps coming back high. It is a non-specific test, and all it does is show inflammation. I'll bet the bank that all MS patients have high Sed rates on this test.

I'm considering consulting a hematologist on this one.

I agree with the world according to Bob. RRMS is the stage when disability is low because of plasticity and lack of damage. As the inflammation and damage continue, you just run out of nerves to rewire.

Doesn't mean we're giving up the good fight, however!
AC

_________________
Husband dx RRMS 3/07
dx dual jugular vein stenosis (CCSVI) 4/09
dual stents placed 5/09
CCSVI in MS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 3:05 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 1148
Location: Northern Ontario, Canada
i guess what i am thinking is how they (the trial people) can say no you don't qualify because you don't have an active mri. is rrms a different disease or ?? i just don't understand this.

_________________
Had ms for over 19 years now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 3:14 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 4:00 pm
Posts: 750
Bob

Quote:
That's the first nail in the "neurodegeneration in the absence of inflammation theory.

I'm curious and hope you're not offended, but whose theory is that besides yours Bob? :roll: I've never understood that to be the major question in the inflammation vs. neurodegeneration debate.

Thanks! All references welcome and appreciated. :)

Sharon


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 3:21 pm 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 3:00 pm
Posts: 6063
..


Last edited by Lyon on Wed Jun 22, 2011 7:37 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 3:39 pm 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 3:00 pm
Posts: 6063
..


Last edited by Lyon on Wed Jun 22, 2011 7:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 4:07 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 4:00 pm
Posts: 750
Bob
Quote:
big meanie who likes to pick on Bob wrote:
I've never understood that to be the major question in the inflammation vs. neurodegeneration debate.
You've never understood WHAT to be the big question in the inflammation vs neurodegeneration debate?

Thanks Bob--I'm really not trying to pick on you. I just don't have a clue as to why you repeatedly focus on neurodegeneration without inflammation. I have the impression that's a major point you're trying to make and obviously refute, but WHY?

According to your theory, as I understand it, the question would be: Is there neurodegeneration in the absence of inflammation? My question to you is: Do you think that's the question they're trying to answer in the neurodegeneration vs inflammation debate?

Sharon


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 4:42 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 4:00 pm
Posts: 750
Bob

Responding to your "afterthought"--sorry, didn't see it before.
Quote:
there are those who question whether inflammation is responsible for neurodegeneration


Quote:
there are those who take the lack of "evident" inflammation on MRI and continuing neurodegeneration to mean that there is such a thing as "neurodegeneration in the absence of inflammation"


Ok, I understand the second quote as one interpretation of the Campath trial. Inflammation was more or less eliminated but brain atrophy continued in people with SPMS.

I've just thought the focus in the debate was primarily centered on which came first--the neurodegeneration or the inflammation?

There are definitely MS researchers who theorize that the neurodegeneration occurs before the inflammation and that the inflammation is secondary to the neurodegeneration. I don't know that they generally believe that inflammation doesn't ultimately contribute to neurodegeneration though.

I tend to think the neurodegeneration just might precede and result in the inflammation, but the inflammation (visible/invisible) could also certainly contribute to the neurodegeneration.

Hopefully that sorts it out....

Sharon


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 5:07 pm 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 3:00 pm
Posts: 6063
..


Last edited by Lyon on Wed Jun 22, 2011 7:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 5:38 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 1148
Location: Northern Ontario, Canada
Quote:

i guess what i am thinking is how they (the trial people) can say no you don't qualify because you don't have an active mri. is rrms a different disease or ?? i just don't understand this

_________________
Had ms for over 19 years now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 5:43 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 4:00 pm
Posts: 750
Bob

Agreed--we are just left with a guess.

Your focus and emphasis, if I understand correctly, seems to be on eliminating visible and invisible inflammation. My focus is on stopping neurodegeneration.

If they'd just get on with sorting it out I bet we'd both be happy campers. :)

Sharon


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 5:56 pm 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 3:00 pm
Posts: 6063
..


Last edited by Lyon on Wed Jun 22, 2011 7:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 6:05 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 1148
Location: Northern Ontario, Canada
Who gives a shit Chicken or the Egg... why won't they give these drugs to spms, there are people here who are border line rr/spms getting accepted or not being accepted and it feels like there is a window here that if it closes you will be left behind.

_________________
Had ms for over 19 years now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 6:08 pm 
Offline
Volunteer Moderator

Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 4:00 pm
Posts: 7633
robbie speaking of shit...


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 88 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Difference between PPMS and SPMS?

adamt

2

910

Fri Sep 24, 2010 2:57 am

adamt View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. For those who are PPMS/SPMS (poll)

Filmmaker

11

1364

Sun Apr 10, 2011 1:39 am

brave View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Potential treatment for SPMS and/or PPMS

Anonymoose

4

503

Sat Mar 16, 2013 4:58 pm

jimmylegs View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. US Patent granted for 20 year old drug for PPMS and SPMS

milesap

0

653

Thu Feb 02, 2012 8:11 am

milesap View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Study re Wahls method for PPMS SPMS now recruiting

CaliReader

3

405

Mon Feb 11, 2013 3:25 pm

NHE View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


News News Site map Site map SitemapIndex SitemapIndex RSS Feed RSS Feed Channel list Channel list
Read hundreds of Multiple Sclerosis stories on Experience Project. Experience Project is community where people connect through their life experiences. It's made by the same people who built This is MS, on the premise that no single life experience-- like having MS-- defines a person. EP covers over 10 million true stories about every possible life experience. Find yours!


Interesting: Secret Confessions | Dream Meanings | Ask Questions, Get Answers | Song Meanings