This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Community: Knowledge & Support

Welcome to the world's leading forum on Multiple Sclerosis research, support, and knowledge. For over 10 years, This is MS has provided an unbiased community dedicated to Multiple Sclerosis patients, caregivers, and affected loved ones.
It is currently Sun May 19, 2013 4:54 pm


All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 1:32 pm 
Offline
Family Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 3:00 pm
Posts: 89
I got a phone call and my co-pay is 30% which is $758.84/month. I am nausous.

They are referring me to see if I qualify for financial assistance which I am sure I do not.

It just gets better and better...

Edited to change the price since I talked to Blue Cross (pharmacy, not financial aid). Not quite as bad but I still feel pukey. :(


Last edited by Just_Me on Tue Nov 24, 2009 4:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 2:04 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 3:00 pm
Posts: 2197
Location: Dayton, Ohio USA
8O 8O I thought my $525 for Tysabri was bad. Good lord. I hope something in terms of aid works out for you.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 5:07 pm 
Offline
Family Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 3:00 pm
Posts: 89
I called Blue Cross again and found out why it is so high. Since its an injectible, I am charged the rate for medical coverage (30% after deductible) rather than for Rx coverage which would be $30/mo!!!! WTF do they allowed to do that? Is that how insulin is charged?

Any idea when this med will be in pill form?

Anyone ever hear of a doctor precribing a med from out of the country?
The generic in Canada is cheaper so 30% of that would be closer to affordable.

I'm seriously thinking of divorcing if lowering my income will make a difference.

This is really crappy. :x


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 6:05 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 3:00 pm
Posts: 1068
Just_Me wrote:
I called Blue Cross again and found out why it is so high. Since its an injectible, I am charged the rate for medical coverage (30% after deductible) rather than for Rx coverage which would be $30/mo!!!! WTF do they allowed to do that? Is that how insulin is charged?

Any idea when this med will be in pill form?

Anyone ever hear of a doctor precribing a med from out of the country?
The generic in Canada is cheaper so 30% of that would be closer to affordable.

I'm seriously thinking of divorcing if lowering my income will make a difference.

This is really crappy. :x


I'm not expert on how these insurance companies work, but I would just make sure there's no miscommunication going on. It almost sounds like they are quoting you a co-pay for an infusion, rather than a self-administered med.

I don't think there's a generic for Copaxone yet. I know the meds in Canada are probably cheaper, but I'm not sure how you would go about obtaining them.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 7:35 pm 
Offline
Family Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 3:00 pm
Posts: 75
I've got Blue-Cross and my copay is $30. Of course there are many flavors of this insurance out there, so who knows. But I agree it sounds like a miscommunication Fingers crossed!

Shared Solutions is also a resource for you:
http://www.copaxone.com/supportServices ... ssist.aspx


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 8:06 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 201
Location: Didsbury, Alberta Canada
Just_Me,

I have been on copaxone for 3+ years. I have Blue Cross insurance through my husbands workplace. I live in Alberta, Canada, so I'm not sure if Blue Cross is the same everywhere? It is my understanding through my neuro (we were considering a self-employment opportunity), so we asked what it would cost us to get our own Blue Cross & I understood it was only going to cost an annual fee of about $500 to get the 100% coverage that I presently have.

Absentee's link to Shared Solutions is worth checking. I have been told in the past that if there were ever a reason that I could not afford the medication to let them know. I got the sense that they have resources. It's my opinion (& more importantly, the opinion of my neurologist) that my disease is in check because I got onto disease modifying therapy very early. Best of luck.

Deb


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 8:58 pm 
Offline
Family Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 3:00 pm
Posts: 89
Shared Solutions told me Blue Cross said 30%. Then I called Blue Cross's pharmacy myself and they told me the amount of $757.84. I called member services & he told me at first it was $30 copay for brand name drugs after a $250 deductible but when I asked if it was $30 or 30% he put me on hold and came back and told me it was billed as medical since it was an injectible.

Still though - Are diabetic & others who need injections charged like that? I've never heard of it.

Deb (DLB) - Do you mean a $500 increase in premiums for 100% Rx coverage? I have an individual plan (self employed) and pay about $600/mo for me & my family because of my advance age (haha) of 46. I know plan rates are different in different areas and it goes up to another bracket every 5 yrs.

Absentee - What state are you, do you know what plan you have and is it purchased by you or an employer? I'd like to look it up & see what the wording is compared to my plan.

patientx - I wonder if you are right and the idyits I talked to think I'm going to have to have an infusiions rather than self-admin. But you'd think Shared-Solutions would know - they seemed to know about Blue Cross (knew the name of the pharmacy at least).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 9:48 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 201
Location: Didsbury, Alberta Canada
It was a couple of years ago that we inquired but as I recall the annual premium was around the $500. What I'm not sure about is whether or not it was 100% coverage?? I'm in Canada - where are you? We might be comparing apples to oranges...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 6:44 am 
Offline
Newbie
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 4
Hey I am in Canada too my Copaxone is 15oo.oo per month and hubby and I really don't qualify for help if we decide to go that route it is $600 every three months but then I have to sign over all our benefits which is 40,000.00 per year make sense to you?? cuz I could go to jail and the governemt would pay??...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 7:56 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 3:00 pm
Posts: 2197
Location: Dayton, Ohio USA
Just_Me wrote:
I called Blue Cross again and found out why it is so high. Since its an injectible, I am charged the rate for medical coverage (30% after deductible) rather than for Rx coverage which would be $30/mo!!!! WTF do they allowed to do that? Is that how insulin is charged?

Any idea when this med will be in pill form?

Anyone ever hear of a doctor precribing a med from out of the country?
The generic in Canada is cheaper so 30% of that would be closer to affordable.

I'm seriously thinking of divorcing if lowering my income will make a difference.

This is really crappy. :x


That's what they did to me too! Even though it's drug, they covered that one under "major medical". Pissed me off and I'm glad I don't take any of those anymore.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 8:31 am 
Offline
Family Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 3:00 pm
Posts: 75
Just_Me wrote:

Absentee - What state are you, do you know what plan you have and is it purchased by you or an employer? I'd like to look it up & see what the wording is compared to my plan.



I'm in MA and yes it is provided through my employer. But it was the same while on Harvard Pilgrim (another insurer here in MA). It is just considered a prescription and $30 is the copay for this level of brand-name drug. Do you purchase yours on your own?

In case anyone who is healthy and without needs wonders if the US health care system is broken, it totally is. As if being hit with MS is not bad enough, insurance concerns on top of it is just insulting.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 8:55 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 357
Location: Connecticut
Two things -- I have Anthem and Copaxone is considered out of network. My policy has a million dollar out of network lifetime limit, then I'm done. At 30K a year, it adds up faster than you'd like. Just something to be aware of. BUT that's just MY policy. They're all different.
The good news is that pills are on their way. There's not a Copaxone equivalent but Cladrine may be available during the summer if its approved. The next one schedule to file with the FDA is Fingolimod. If approved, that will be available sometime next year, too. There are 3 other pills in Phase III trials, so there's hope that we can ditch the needles soon.
I haven't seen much info on what they're planning on charging for the pills, but I'd be surprised if they cost less than the injectibles.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 9:25 am 
Offline
Family Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 3:00 pm
Posts: 89
Absentee wrote:
Just_Me wrote:

Absentee - What state are you, do you know what plan you have and is it purchased by you or an employer? I'd like to look it up & see what the wording is compared to my plan.



I'm in MA and yes it is provided through my employer. But it was the same while on Harvard Pilgrim (another insurer here in MA). It is just considered a prescription and $30 is the copay for this level of brand-name drug. Do you purchase yours on your own?

In case anyone who is healthy and without needs wonders if the US health care system is broken, it totally is. As if being hit with MS is not bad enough, insurance concerns on top of it is just insulting.

I have an individual plan (self employed). I wonder if it makes a difference if I'm in CA.

I don't think people on insulin or other injectible drugs have this issue. Isn't that descrimination??


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 9:36 am 
Offline
Family Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 3:00 pm
Posts: 89
Needled wrote:
Two things -- I have Anthem and Copaxone is considered out of network. My policy has a million dollar out of network lifetime limit, then I'm done. At 30K a year, it adds up faster than you'd like. Just something to be aware of. BUT that's just MY policy. They're all different.
The good news is that pills are on their way. There's not a Copaxone equivalent but Cladrine may be available during the summer if its approved. The next one schedule to file with the FDA is Fingolimod. If approved, that will be available sometime next year, too. There are 3 other pills in Phase III trials, so there's hope that we can ditch the needles soon.
I haven't seen much info on what they're planning on charging for the pills, but I'd be surprised if they cost less than the injectibles.

If they charge the needeled as medical and the pills as Rx, then it does make a difference.

This is what my policy info said:
Bc Form Slf-Admn Injectable Drgs Participating Provider 70%
But then the area for "mail order" said $30 copay.

I have a $5 million cap so I have a while before I use that up (hopefully!)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 10:01 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 357
Location: Connecticut
Quote:
I have a $5 million cap so I have a while before I use that up (hopefully!)

See, there's your good news for the day!
Even though I don't plan on taking Cladribine, you can bet I'll be on the phone as soon as the FDA approves it (fingers crossed, cuz others want it)to find out what they're charging.
EDIT: Lost part of my post :roll: Yes, the difference between pills and injectibles would make a really big difference for you. I still think we're going to be in for sticker shock on the price of the pills.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Scientific publishing. The price of information.

NHE

0

308

Tue Feb 07, 2012 3:29 am

NHE View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Another one for copaxone!

MrsGeorge

7

1636

Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:17 am

eric593 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. To Copaxone or not to Copaxone

dreddk

8

1885

Mon Jul 14, 2008 6:41 pm

DizzyDean View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. who wants my copaxone?

wyndells99

4

539

Tue Apr 16, 2013 2:37 pm

centenarian100 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. who wants my copaxone?

wyndells99

1

167

Wed May 08, 2013 12:37 pm

jimmylegs View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: elyse_peace


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: