This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Community: Knowledge & Support

<shortened url>

I would say this is mistaken, the procedure was found to be less effective on the group in Zamboni's trial. However, they were also almost 2-3 times longer duration (RR 5.1±4.4, SP 14±7.8, PP 9.3±6.3), and with EDSS averages much higher than the RR group. The trial's measures also leaned towards "repair".

I think Shtybel is completely off base or misquoted here. I found many labs around Sydney that have the Ultrasound "technology" to perform the tests, they simply were not trained to use the equipment for this use. I found a neurologist who said they were simple standard tests, and another two radiologist that said they were standard tests, but only really commonly performed on patients within the hospital setting.

Zamboni not only agrees with this, but actually reports on cases where the stenosis returns. The MS pathology returns.

Thanks for claryfying!!! I was going to point out some of the mistakes the author made as well but I figured I would wait until someone with a little more knowledge on the liberation procedure commented!! Thanks.