|
This thread is meant as humour.
Welcomed postings on this thread:
1. Any statement(s) to the effect that "CCSVI has not been proven."
2. Any statement(s) to the effect that more study is needed or the science is not there yet about CCSVI "theory". Especially unwelcome are statements which are specific about CCSVI-related studies that are there yet.
3. Any statement(s) that prove, by context, spelling, or grammar that the poster is unaware of or does not care about the correct use the term CCSVI, or what the acronym stands for or means, or statements that use this acronym as a noun for something other than a medical condition or a treatment for one (i.e. belief system, argument, cure, instrument, etcetera.) Especially requested are statements that mean angioplasty or procedure but use instead the unadorned acronym.
4. Any use of the given name of a doctor without the prefix "Dr.", or pejoratives describing a doctor. Discussion of neurologists, except the ones who favour or perform the CCSVI Procedure, are encouraged, only in a positive way, with the prefix "Dr."
The main purpose of this thread is to provide an outlet for those who suffer from neighsaying, repetitosis, verbatrocity or verbaciousness, negativitis, keyboard halitosis or ultimateword syndrome. They can't help it. They know who they are. It is also to be hoped it will reduce global warming by saving the trillions of kilojoules used in scrolling past such postings elsewhere.
_________________
"Try - Just A Little Bit Harder" - Janis Joplin
CCSVI procedure Albany Aug 2010
'MS' is over - if you want it
Patients sans/without patience
|
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
