MarkLavelle wrote:
Not to disagree, but maybe a refinement:
My neuros both told me that lesions are visible with or without contrast. They do a 2nd scan with gadolinium to identify the active or recent lesions.
Good luck,
Mark
Hi Scott,
I agree with Mark's comment above. My first brain MRI 8 years ago was
without contrast, and it still showed so many MS-type lesions in my brain that I got a diagnosis the next day before I even saw my first neuro. The physiatrist said that he and the radiologist agreed they were almost 100% certain I had MS just from the MRIs.
A year later I got a 2nd set of MRIs both
with and without contrast, and a 3rd set a year after that. All three of those MRIs showed the same lesions, no change, and the gadolinium has never shown any enhancement. And there was no enhancement in my most recent 2011 MRI either. (I also passed later tests to confirm, like the spinal tap.)
If you click on the link in my previous post (or right here), you can see the MRIs I posted.
general-discussion-f1/topic16335.htmlI do agree that it made no sense for them to skip the gadolinium, because if they HAD found lesions, it would have helped evaluate them. Good luck to you on finding some answers and some relief!