Analysis of 40 JH HiCy Patients

A board to discuss Revimmune as a potential therapy for multiple sclerosis

Analysis of 40 JH HiCy Patients

Postby Frank » Thu Sep 01, 2011 2:47 am

Treatment of RRMS with high dose cyclophosphamide induction

CyclophosphamideBackground: Previous studies have described stabilization of aggressive multiple sclerosis (MS) with one-time induction therapy with high-dose cyclophosphamide (HiCy). The long-term benefit of this stabilization followed by conventional therapy has not been explored.

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and clinical outcomes following treatment of relapsing-remitting MS with HiCy induction therapy followed by glatiramer acetate maintenance.

Methods: A retrospective review of a closely followed population of thirty two MS patients treated with HiCy (200mg/kg intravenous infusion over 4 days) followed by maintenance with glatiramer acetate was performed.

Results: Annualized relapse rate was reduced from 1.37 in the 2 years prior to treatment to 0.27 over a mean post-treatment follow-up period of 14 months (range 0.5-33.8). The projected probability of relapse-free survival at 2 years was 0.64 (95% CI 0.37-0.82). The projected probability of Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) progression-free survival at 2 years was 0.77 (95% CI 0.43-0.92). The mean number of gadolinium-enhanced lesions was reduced from 0.86 (SD 1.6) at baseline to 0 at 12 months and 0.08 (SD 0.28) at 15-24 months. A total of 55% of patients had no evidence of disease activity in follow-up. Infectious complications occurred in 47% with no long-term morbidity and no deaths.

Conclusions: Induction therapy with HiCy followed by long-term maintenance with glatiramer acetate is well tolerated in patients with MS, and appears to be efficacious in reducing the risk of relapse, disability progression, and new MRI lesions.

Summary: Recent developments, including the development and licencing of Nataluzimab and Fingolimod have increased the therapeutic avenues available for patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis who continue to get severe relapses despite treatment with the first line disease modifying drugs of interferon beta or glatiramer acetate. However, both Nataluzimab and Fingolimod have side effects which require discontinuation, including infusion reactions, liver function abnormalities and thyroid abnormalities for Nataluzimab, and symptomatic bradycardia, severe headaches and flu like symptoms for Fingolimod, and for these reasons a proportion of patients will not be able to have either treatment. For these patients it is important to have alternative treatments to attempt to prevent relapse associated disability.

In this study the authors performed a retrospective analysis of 40 patients treated with high dose cyclophosphamide for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis at John Hopkins. These patients were treated according to a standardised protocol and had detailed and standardised radiological and clinical follow up with MRI, assessment of relapse number and EDSS assessment every 3 months for 2 years.

This is the largest and most detailed retrospective review to date of the use of cyclophosphamide in patients with relapsing remitting MS. All but one patient had been prescribed disease modifying drugs prior to cyclophosphamide without good clinical effect, and the patients had a median of 2 relapses in the prior 2 years. Cyclophosphamide treatment followed by glatiramer acetate lead to a reduction in annualised relapse rate, and significant reduction in number of gadolinium enhancing lesions at 3 and 12 months. Side effects were however common with 84% of patient experiencing nausea and vomiting and 47% experiencing infections. Whilst an important addition to the therapeutic literature this was not a clinical trial as there was no comparator arm.

Authors: Harrison DM, Gladstone DE, Hammond E, Cheng J, Jones RJ, Brodsky RA, Kerr D, McArthur JC, Kaplin A.

Source: Multiple Sclerosis 2011, August 24 & Pubmed PMID: 21865410 (01/09/11)
Treatment: Gilenya since 01/2011, CCSVI both IJV ballooned 09/2010, Tysabri stopped after 24 Infusions and positive JCV antibody test, after LDN, ABX Wheldon Regime for 1 year.
Frank
Family Elder
 
Posts: 543
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 3:00 pm
Location: Germany

Advertisement

Re: Analysis of 40 JH HiCy Patients

Postby rssugg » Mon Sep 26, 2011 10:06 am

Would someone please tell me why this is getting almost no attention from these boards?

Ive been waiting on this for years and its almost here!
User avatar
rssugg
Family Elder
 
Posts: 104
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 2:00 pm

Re: Analysis of 40 JH HiCy Patients

Postby chrishasms » Mon Oct 10, 2011 12:16 pm

I just talked to one of the doctors there and they have 4 million and need 11 million more for the phase 3 study and none of the big drug companies are willing to help.
chrishasms
Family Elder
 
Posts: 1161
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 2:00 pm

Re: Analysis of 40 JH HiCy Patients

Postby Tracker » Wed Nov 09, 2011 7:09 pm

Sorry to be cynical chrishasms, but the drug companies are not interested in drugs that work too well, only maintenance drugs. MS is a business, and

to slow the disease down too much would be bad for business and their shareholders. Curing MS is not an option, just keeping sufferers comfortable

on maintenance drugs is. A cash cow.

Millions of $$ have been spent devloping other drugs, and if this drug was significantly superior and sought after, no one would want the other drugs,
Tracker
Family Member
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2011 2:02 am

Re: Analysis of 40 JH HiCy Patients

Postby chrishasms » Mon Nov 21, 2011 12:20 pm

Cynical is ok. It's why revimmune had to be invented. It was the only way they could sell Cyclophosphamide and make money. It Sux I know.
chrishasms
Family Elder
 
Posts: 1161
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 2:00 pm

Re: Analysis of 40 JH HiCy Patients

Postby CureOrBust » Tue Nov 22, 2011 1:20 am

rssugg wrote:Would someone please tell me why this is getting almost no attention from these boards?
I can't talk for others, but for myself. I lost initial interest in HyCy. as originally there were rumours of near cure of MS and reversal of disability. However, now it all looks more reserved, similar to Campath. By my quick calcs, we are taking about an 80% reduction in relapses, while using the new oral route we get around 70%. I personally have zero reactions to fingolimod, while HyCy has some more chance for side effects, and at the end, I would still be on an injectable. Like most MS treatments, the closer it gets to availability, the less promising it looks.
User avatar
CureOrBust
Family Elder
 
Posts: 2926
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 2:00 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: Analysis of 40 JH HiCy Patients

Postby rssugg » Tue Nov 22, 2011 7:31 am

While everyone else was looking and hoping for CCSVI, Revimmune has been slowly getting their ducks in order and is poised to get on the market shortly. If a drug is working good for you, and you don't want to get rid of this disease, then that means I dont have to wait as long to get revimmune. We both win!
User avatar
rssugg
Family Elder
 
Posts: 104
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 2:00 pm


Return to Revimmune (cyclophosphamide or cytoxan)

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


Contact us | Terms of Service