will undoubtedly occur.anyway they will be capable to came back with an other name. at this point you can ban a ip address, but it can be easy to change ip address
I'll watch my words very carefully so that I'm not taken as sarcasticJCB wrote:It seems that there are some people who are here frequently that are obviously anti-CCSVI.
but considering everyone here either has MS or a loved one with MS, being "anti-CCSVI" is akin to being "pro-abortion" in that there are those who ungraciously bestow the term upon others but no one really considers the title fitting, and in fact find the title unflattering. The fact that it's considered unflattering is the clearest sign that the person using the term is wrong........as in this case.slightly veiled innuendo or sarcastic comments aimed at the poster
JCB wrote:I agree that we are old enough and smart enough to think for ourselves.
Shayk wrote:Very early on when this started several attempts were made to give "skeptics" their very own thread in the CCSVI topic. It makes sense to me that skeptical research, information and comments on the subject could be contained like that for easy reference. Obviously it didn't work the first time but maybe another try. In the interim, I'll be starting my "banning" documentation.
garyak wrote:It's so hard not to get a bit upset at some of the negative ccsvi posts that are from repeat posters.
Their styles, when they reply, often appear to be just wanting to get us pwMS riled up. I have really aggro MS and before my procedure I often thought about how and when to kill myself. So I have a fairly short fuse for some posters.
I now have hope for my future and are in much better mental health since my procedure. I try to be tolerant but it's tough at times.
MrSuccess wrote:marc - you know that I like you ..... and admire your contributions ....
and you have an amazing amount of information to share ..... but .....
I have read Dr. S's recent reply to your CCSVI post .
I think the good doctor has given you and us ..... some pretty damn good
information . It's clear to me .... Dr. S .... disagrees with some of what you say .... which makes me wonder if you misunderstood Dr. Zivadov .
Am I wrong ?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users