I agree that we are old enough and smart enough to think for ourselves.
I did come on a little strong. I also picked my words so carefully! No naming names.
Very early on when this started several attempts were made to give "skeptics" their very own thread in the CCSVI topic. It makes sense to me that skeptical research, information and comments on the subject could be contained like that for easy reference. Obviously it didn't work the first time but maybe another try. In the interim, I'll be starting my "banning" documentation.
Interesting idea about the separate subforum, maybe that would do it. Thanks, Shayk.
It's so hard not to get a bit upset at some of the negative ccsvi posts that are from repeat posters.
Their styles, when they reply, often appear to be just wanting to get us pwMS riled up. I have really aggro MS and before my procedure I often thought about how and when to kill myself. So I have a fairly short fuse for some posters.
I now have hope for my future and are in much better mental health since my procedure. I try to be tolerant but it's tough at times.
Garyak, so glad that the procedure worked for you. Yes, you hit the nail on the head about the styles that seemed designed to rile up or in my opinion mock people here.
But Marc raises good points too.
Jimmylegs, I searched but couldn't find anything about the last person banned...what did he/she do?