merlin26 wrote:I'm curious isn't revimmune pretty much the same thing as this protocol? Only difference being they dont remove your stem cells in revimmune. They just stimulate them with iv drugs to help rebuild your immune system, right? Why would one protocol be more curative than the other? Don't they pretty much give a similar outcome/benefit? I was leaning more towards revimmune due to it being the safer protocol but if HSCT has better results than id rather risk that. Could anyone perhaps help convince me which one they think would give me more of a chance to be cured of this retched disease?
Lyon wrote:Hi Liberation. While this article is specific to Revimmune because it's centered on the Revimmune researchers, I've always found it an interesting read https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B3me8Y ... ZlZGIwOWNm
CVfactor wrote:Im curious about the facility in Germany that George and Asher had HSCT. It seems that they have a well established protocol and seems they do this on many people with MS. So does this mean that it is a recignizes treatment in Germany or are they mostly catering to people who have the wealth to have this performed?
CVfactor wrote:It seems that the donor cell type of HSCT is viable for some types of leukemia treatment. If this is the case are there any facilities in the US that do this and if so why wouldnt they perform the autologus type for people who have the funds?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users