This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Community: Knowledge & Support

Welcome to the world's leading forum on Multiple Sclerosis research, support, and knowledge. For over 10 years, This is MS has provided an unbiased community dedicated to Multiple Sclerosis patients, caregivers, and affected loved ones.
It is currently Wed Jun 19, 2013 1:16 pm


All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Aug 17, 2012 6:50 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 4:00 pm
Posts: 327
Tracker wrote:
Packo wrote:
Few weeks ago I contacted Prof. Slavin, he let me know that the CTCI team is now able to (in the laboratory) trans-differentiate bone marrow and adipose tissue derived mesenchymal stromal stem cells (MSC) to neural stem cells, motor neurons, dopaminergic neurons, astrocytes and oligodendrocytes that can produce myelin, and therefore he believes it may be possible to use such methods to induce re-myelination in patients with multiple sclerosis. They need to do animal studies to confirm the efficacy of their new patented procedure before they can get approval to apply that methods clinically. He also stated that adipose tissue derived mesenchymal stromal stem cells seem to develop much faster and much nicer as compared with bone marrow derived stem cells but they do not yet know which source of MSCs is more effective clinically.
The future looks bright!

Professor Slavin told me that to do the animal studies, they need funding of approx USD$2-3million. When they have the funding, the studies will be done, and if proven, clinical application will begin immediately.
Anyone got ideas how to raise the funds?


Do you know how much this procedure would be different from NurOwn tested clinically at Hadassah? Did he mention anything about potential timing?

I just received an answer from prof Slavin and he said that he thinks colony expanded MSC treatment is safe. He also said that his experience is that 60-70% of the patients benefit from that. They apply circa 1-2 million MSC per body kilogram. Most of the MSCs are applied intrathecal while the rest IV. He was a pioneer of this treatment. He played a key role in developping this protocol at Hadassah. Most of the ongoing clinical trials with MSCs just follow his footsteps and try to replicate his findings. In the meantime, he is over many treatments.

As for the clinical trials where they completed phase 1 at Hadassah, 11 patients out of 15 showed improvement in EDSS. The average improvement of these patients was 1,2 in EDSS in 6 months. No one showed deterioration in EDSS in tha same period. He also told me that the sooner you get any treatment the more you can benefit from that.

As for replicating his results, in the UK they plan to finish phase 2 in 5 years with 150 patients. Then, will just phase 3 start. So, offical results will come out probably in 10 years.

I also talked to an academist in this field, who has no ties to any clinics profiting from this treatment, and he said that he thinks MSC is fairly safe and he would take part in such a clinical trial if he had MS.

I am just wondering how Celltex's adipose tissue derived treatment compares to this. They claim that they inject 600 million MSCs vs. circa 150 million MSCs applied in other places. Their treatment is IRB reviewed. Anyone knows about IRB reviewed treatments? How safe are they?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 3:01 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 4:00 pm
Posts: 327
Liberation wrote:
I just received an answer from prof Slavin and he said that he thinks colony expanded MSC treatment is safe. He also said that his experience is that 60-70% of the patients benefit from that. They apply circa 1-2 million MSC per body kilogram. Most of the MSCs are applied intrathecal while the rest IV. He was a pioneer of this treatment. He played a key role in developping this protocol at Hadassah. Most of the ongoing clinical trials with MSCs just follow his footsteps and try to replicate his findings. In the meantime, he is over many treatments.

As for the clinical trials where they completed phase 1 at Hadassah, 11 patients out of 15 showed improvement in EDSS. The average improvement of these patients was 1,2 in EDSS in 6 months. No one showed deterioration in EDSS in tha same period. He also told me that the sooner you get any treatment the more you can benefit from that.

As for replicating his results, in the UK they plan to finish phase 2 in 5 years with 150 patients. Then, will just phase 3 start. So, offical results will come out probably in 10 years.

I also talked to an academist in this field, who has no ties to any clinics profiting from this treatment, and he said that he thinks MSC is fairly safe and he would take part in such a clinical trial if he had MS.

I am just wondering how Celltex's adipose tissue derived treatment compares to this. They claim that they inject 600 million MSCs vs. circa 150 million MSCs applied in other places. Their treatment is IRB reviewed. Anyone knows about IRB reviewed treatments? How safe are they?


Just one thing that I was thinking about combining different treatments. Prof. Slavin told me that "... If active lesions are present we sometimes recommend autologous stem cell transplantation in an attempt to re-induce self tolerance by re-building the immune system. If no gadolinium enanced lesions, treatment with MSCs seems best. ..."

"...for patients with active inflammatory disease we use of special antibodies (these are anti-CD52 monoclonal antibodies named Alemtuzumab or MabCampath) or lymphocytotoxic agents that suppress or eliminate the self-reactive lymphocytes. "

So, does it mean if someone is in the progressive stage (either ppms or spms) and he or she does not have any active laesios, then HSCT and Alemtuzumab is not recommended? I do not really understand why.

Isn't Revimunne something like a lymphocytotoxic agent / cyclophosphamide?

If the numbers Prof Slavin said about the success rate of using MSC of 60-70% that is quite similar to the succes rate of HSCT, isn't it? Of, course, they have a very different effect.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 23, 2013 2:35 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 4:00 pm
Posts: 327
Just an interesting thing: I checked out on the net how the Canadian golf player is doing today. She got MSC infusion back in 2008 and she improved a lot afterwards. So, according to her CV, she is still golf instructor at the same place. It sounds good.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 12:57 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 4:00 pm
Posts: 197
The FDA has ruled that our own stem cells, when expanded in the lab to an effective dose level, are a drug, subject to FDA regulations. We feel this is an overreach of their authority. We conducted a survey of the National Library of Medicine pubmed.gov and found that over 2,154 patients across 66 studies have been treated with autologous (your own) expanded mesenchymal stem cells. All studies concluded treatment was well tolerated, no adverse events, no tumors or cancer. Consensus is building that safety has been established, and efficacy can now be the focus. http://www.patientsforstemcells.org/edu ... tem-cells/

We also have a news page for the latest on mesenchymal stem cell therapy http://www.facebook.com/PatientsForStemCells

It is wrong to force US citizens into medical tourism to gain access to their own stem cells. The State legislature in Kansas has recently passed a bill to fund adult stem cell research, and Texas has just introduced a bill. Please contact me if you want more information or contacts with legislators or doctors who support this.

I was treated May 2012 in the Celltex stem cell trial in Texas, along with 233 other patients for various conditions, 30 with MS and 20 with Parkinsons, before the FDA interrupted the trial. This study will be published in 2014. I've had great recovery from multiple sclerosis, when I was on the verge of the nursing home at age 47, now I won't be needing that.

SammyJo

_________________
RRMS '96 SPMS '02 | Dual jugular vein stenosis (CCSVI) | 10/09 3 stents, 1 angioplasty. Details http://healingpowernow.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Mesenchymal stem cells

dignan

0

1313

Sun Aug 26, 2007 11:07 am

dignan View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. CD34+ versus MSC's (Mesenchymal Stem Cells)

chilli123

5

1720

Sat Sep 05, 2009 12:35 pm

BEZALEL View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells

dignan

0

1225

Mon Jun 19, 2006 6:15 am

dignan View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Mesenchymal stem cell trial results

dignan

0

1353

Fri Jul 27, 2007 7:52 am

dignan View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Completed mesenchymal stem cell trial

Frank

0

1713

Mon Nov 26, 2007 5:39 am

Frank View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


News News Site map Site map SitemapIndex SitemapIndex RSS Feed RSS Feed Channel list Channel list
Read hundreds of personal Multiple Sclerosis stories on Experience Project. Experience Project is an anonymous community where people connect through their life experiences, made by the same people who built This is MS. With over 30 million personal stories about every possible life experience, you can quickly find people like you!


Interesting: Secret Confessions | Dream Meanings | Ask Questions, Get Answers

Advertise on the premier multiple sclerosis forum