This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Community: Knowledge & Support

Welcome to the world's leading forum on Multiple Sclerosis research, support, and knowledge. For over 10 years, This is MS has provided an unbiased community dedicated to Multiple Sclerosis patients, caregivers, and affected loved ones.
It is currently Sun May 19, 2013 12:36 pm


All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 2:26 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 3:00 pm
Posts: 1681
Multiple Sclerosis - possible autologous stem cell hope - http://tinyurl.com/5wkydw

_________________
The Multiple Sclerosis Resource Centre

Squiffy's House of Fun - Laughter for Multiple Sclerosis


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 10:04 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 4:00 pm
Posts: 553
Location: Ottawa, Ont. Canada
Thanks Squiffy, things are moving along....... Carole


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 11:18 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2008 4:00 pm
Posts: 1323
Things are moving along nicely! I look forward to some larger trials and some more posiitive results(fingers crossed).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 5:56 pm 
Offline
Family Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 3:00 pm
Posts: 65
I was in the NIH study for this but dropped out when I saw the risks outweighed the possible benefit. Do not be fooled, this may be a great soultion for some but the first trial was with Progresive MSrs and bc it wasn't foolprof or a slam dunk they are looking at RRMS folks now. The thing to remember is thst this is VERY aggressive, risky and NOT A CURE as many in the study felt the need to be back on interferions etc. again.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 1:33 pm 
Offline
Family Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 93
Location: ON, Canada
lmacalus wrote:
I was in the NIH study for this but dropped out when I saw the risks outweighed the possible benefit. Do not be fooled, this may be a great soultion for some but the first trial was with Progresive MSrs and bc it wasn't foolprof or a slam dunk they are looking at RRMS folks now. The thing to remember is thst this is VERY aggressive, risky and NOT A CURE as many in the study felt the need to be back on interferions etc. again.

lmacalus - Thanks for your honesty.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 29, 2011 3:01 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 4:00 pm
Posts: 324
lmacalus wrote:
I was in the NIH study for this but dropped out when I saw the risks outweighed the possible benefit. Do not be fooled, this may be a great soultion for some but the first trial was with Progresive MSrs and bc it wasn't foolprof or a slam dunk they are looking at RRMS folks now. The thing to remember is thst this is VERY aggressive, risky and NOT A CURE as many in the study felt the need to be back on interferions etc. again.


Anyone knows what are the risks and benefits associated with this treatment?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 7:57 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 3:00 pm
Posts: 187
Liberation, check out George Goss' website, it has links to tons of studies on the subject. The 2 worst are an up to 5% mortality rate and morbidity associated with infections gotten while the immune system is out of commission. 80% of people who have this treatment done show some improvement in symptoms at 10yrs, while no RRMS patients in the studies I have read had any further progression of symptoms.

_________________
"A gun is a tool, Marian; no better or no worse than any other tool: an axe, a shovel or anything. A gun is as good or as bad as the man using it. Remember that." -- Shane

Who is John Galt?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 8:59 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 329
Mortality rate in 'the better facilities' is below 1%.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 2:07 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 4:00 pm
Posts: 324
shucks wrote:
Liberation, check out George Goss' website, it has links to tons of studies on the subject. The 2 worst are an up to 5% mortality rate and morbidity associated with infections gotten while the immune system is out of commission. 80% of people who have this treatment done show some improvement in symptoms at 10yrs, while no RRMS patients in the studies I have read had any further progression of symptoms.


Thank you, shucks.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Stem Cell study offers hope to multiple sclerosis patients

squiffy2

1

544

Mon Jan 14, 2013 1:25 pm

Vivianne766 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Stem Cell Therapy vs. Multiple Sclerosis

mscaregiver

0

1452

Mon Oct 18, 2004 8:44 pm

mscaregiver View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Stem cell promise for multiple sclerosis

squiffy2

1

716

Thu Dec 01, 2011 3:09 am

Asher View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Stem cell breakthrough discovery for multiple sclerosis

squiffy2

2

996

Sun Oct 02, 2011 2:25 pm

Asher View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Adult Stem Cell Research May Benefit Multiple Sclerosis

adjanimals

0

1352

Wed Dec 08, 2004 6:27 pm

adjanimals View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: