And what a logical expansion of your longstanding conspiracy theory Harry.
Well, hop on the bandwagon, always room for more!! We won't worry about facts until we've completely shredded and hounded the bastards of organized medicine for their wanton forward motion despite their lack of.....facts.
Oh well, the current dearth of fact is different because we're enjoying the bandwagon ride!
scorpion wrote:Please refer to where I tell people to "run for the hills" or to "not get this procedure". I certainly hope that I have encouraged people to think about their decision before getting a procedure that has not yet been proven. Recently I posted some research articles that I thought were important which Sou thought were bunk. Guess what. IT WAS OK. CCSVI is a theory not a religion people. CCSVI IS THE ONLY THEORY ON THIS BOARD THAT MAY NOT BE QUESTIONED ! I will say if I want to tell people to run for the hills or stay away from this procedure I will because this is an OPEN FORUM. Only time and scientific scrutiny will tell if CCSVI is for real or not. Getting upset with people who have doubts and questions only make it look more tenuous.
Maybe I was wr......wro.......I might've been less than correct but I got the distinct impression that I could see a light bulb over that aged noggin of yours and that you had a foot on the step and a hand on the handrail of that CCSVI hay wagon.
What more fitting addition to your anti-big pharma stance than cuddling up to the "no possible profit" CCSVI faction.
I hope I can convince you to believe that I'm ashamed of myself for my assumptions.
Lyon wrote:I absolutely agree that further research is needed and will be very interesting.HarryZ wrote: The surgical results of his 118 patients are quite astounding at this point and certainly deserve a lot more research.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users