What is 'lesions reduction'?
Posted: Tue Mar 30, 2010 6:35 am
Pardon my lack of knowledge and / or understanding.
I read in many posts that this med or this supplement or this regimen proved an (example) 60% reduction on active (sometimes not?) lesions...
Well; the question is: is that the existing lesions reduced to 60% of what they were (which mathematically would make the lesions almost non-existent after 8 sessions) or that the non-subject would get the 40% of the new active lesions...
How on earth are those lesions reduction computed? if we take 100 peeps; and all of them get x-Anti-MS-X's drug and that 60% of them have no "more" active lesions than 100 peeps that take nothing; how can we deduct that 60% is the result? And that 'without' the 'reduction' factor ...?
In the first case; if the lesions were reduced; how can MS still exists? The subject then is merely myelin regeneration?
Can anybody explain or direct me to something that clearly explain that?
Thanks and sorry for the babbling
I read in many posts that this med or this supplement or this regimen proved an (example) 60% reduction on active (sometimes not?) lesions...
Well; the question is: is that the existing lesions reduced to 60% of what they were (which mathematically would make the lesions almost non-existent after 8 sessions) or that the non-subject would get the 40% of the new active lesions...
How on earth are those lesions reduction computed? if we take 100 peeps; and all of them get x-Anti-MS-X's drug and that 60% of them have no "more" active lesions than 100 peeps that take nothing; how can we deduct that 60% is the result? And that 'without' the 'reduction' factor ...?
In the first case; if the lesions were reduced; how can MS still exists? The subject then is merely myelin regeneration?
Can anybody explain or direct me to something that clearly explain that?
Thanks and sorry for the babbling