New recommendation for advised intake of vitamin D
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 3:03 pm
Risk assessment for vitamin D
John N Hathcock, Andrew Shao, Reinhold Vieth, and Robert Heaney
ABSTRACT
The objective of this review was to apply the risk assessment methodology
used by the Food and Nutrition Board (FNB) to derive a revised safe Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL) for vitamin D.
New data continue to emerge regarding the health benefits of vitamin Dbeyond its role in bone. The intakes associated with those benefits suggest a need for levels of supplementation, food fortification, or both that are higher than current levels. A prevailing concern exists, however, regarding the potential for toxicity related to excessive vitaminD intakes. The UL established by the FNB for vitaminD(50 microg, or 2000 IU) is not based on current evidence and is viewed by many as being too restrictive, thus curtailing research, commercial development, and optimization of nutritional policy. Human clinical trial data published subsequent to the establishment of the FNB vitamin D UL published in 1997 support a significantly higher UL.
We present a risk assessment based on relevant, well-designed human
clinical trials of vitamin D. Collectively, the absence of toxicity in trials conducted in healthy adults that used vitamin D dose gt/=250 microg/d (10,000 IU vitamin D3) supports the confident selection of this value as the UL.
Am J Clin Nutr 2007;85:6 –18.
This article is available for reading here.
Cheers
Nick
John N Hathcock, Andrew Shao, Reinhold Vieth, and Robert Heaney
ABSTRACT
The objective of this review was to apply the risk assessment methodology
used by the Food and Nutrition Board (FNB) to derive a revised safe Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL) for vitamin D.
New data continue to emerge regarding the health benefits of vitamin Dbeyond its role in bone. The intakes associated with those benefits suggest a need for levels of supplementation, food fortification, or both that are higher than current levels. A prevailing concern exists, however, regarding the potential for toxicity related to excessive vitaminD intakes. The UL established by the FNB for vitaminD(50 microg, or 2000 IU) is not based on current evidence and is viewed by many as being too restrictive, thus curtailing research, commercial development, and optimization of nutritional policy. Human clinical trial data published subsequent to the establishment of the FNB vitamin D UL published in 1997 support a significantly higher UL.
We present a risk assessment based on relevant, well-designed human
clinical trials of vitamin D. Collectively, the absence of toxicity in trials conducted in healthy adults that used vitamin D dose gt/=250 microg/d (10,000 IU vitamin D3) supports the confident selection of this value as the UL.
Am J Clin Nutr 2007;85:6 –18.
This article is available for reading here.
Cheers
Nick