Page 1 of 1

Can anything be deduced from those images?

Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 12:12 am
by ndwannabe
The more I look at my Doppler, the more suspicious it seems.

I know "they" looked and said it was normal, I still have some questions.

How come my Left Proximal Jugular looks of equal width along whatever distance the image was taken, but the other two images show distinct narrowing. I mean, if the widest part of my Left Distal Jugular image is 5.7mm, what does it make the "skinny" part? About 3mm?

All the while my Right Proximal Jugular is a whooping 22.5mm in the widest part, though looks much skinnier on the other side?

Or is this just the way they do imaging and I am not interpreting it right?

Equal:
Image

Skinny part ~ 3mm?
Image

The fat right one
Image

Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 1:15 am
by Johnson
Hopefully, Doc. Sclafani will comment on it. He knows valves way better than I do. Laugh

All I can really deduce is that those areas are significant to whomever captured the pictures.

Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 5:13 am
by Billmeik
early false creek?

Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 7:06 am
by sou
How about the flows?

Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 10:38 am
by bestadmom
You should post this on Dr. Sclafani's thread. That's the best way to be sure he sees it.