CCSVI in Canada: We need to Challenge the Status Quo
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 9:20 pm
I have been observing the CCSVI debate since '09 and now I am just livid. Initially, I was skeptical of the CCSVI theory, and to some degree I still am. Nevertheless, I like many afflicted with MS, want to be able to explore all avenues. In my typical style, I have sought to educate myself as much as possible about the issue.
I am still not convinced CCSVI treatment (I can't bring myself to say 'liberation treatment' it just sounds too melodramatic) is effective. That said, I should have the right to choose how I am treated. I understand that it is unproven, and if we offered everyone the treatment under the public health care insurance plan the costs would be astronomical. Therefore I do not advocate making it available to all and making taxpayers pay. There is not sufficient evidence at this time to justify that. It would no doubt lead to an undue burden on our healthcare system.
The fact that the treatment is not permitted to be offered here, not even as an elective surgery at the expense of the individual, is monstrous. If it were offered here, it would be significantly less expensive and safer, than traveling to another country for the procedure.
I came across a post from someone else which suggested a class action law suit for discrimination. I actually think this is not a half bad idea. If not for discrimination, than how about the improper use of government authority to restrict us from arranging our medical treatment as we see fit?
Is there anyone out there who agrees? [/i]
I am still not convinced CCSVI treatment (I can't bring myself to say 'liberation treatment' it just sounds too melodramatic) is effective. That said, I should have the right to choose how I am treated. I understand that it is unproven, and if we offered everyone the treatment under the public health care insurance plan the costs would be astronomical. Therefore I do not advocate making it available to all and making taxpayers pay. There is not sufficient evidence at this time to justify that. It would no doubt lead to an undue burden on our healthcare system.
The fact that the treatment is not permitted to be offered here, not even as an elective surgery at the expense of the individual, is monstrous. If it were offered here, it would be significantly less expensive and safer, than traveling to another country for the procedure.
I came across a post from someone else which suggested a class action law suit for discrimination. I actually think this is not a half bad idea. If not for discrimination, than how about the improper use of government authority to restrict us from arranging our medical treatment as we see fit?
Is there anyone out there who agrees? [/i]