Dave says IRs are quacks
Posted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 5:18 am
N.Y. Times, Aug 9, 2010
Thank you for being so very understanding, Dave. Do the initials FOAD ring any bells, Dave?
From later in the page:
But what *is* your profession, Dave? hee-hawery? Maybe you should take more quacking lessons.#17. June 28, 2010 8:39 pm Link
Wow, people grow more stupid with each passing day. I understand the desperation of medically ignorant patients with lowered cognitive reserves, but I do not understand the quackery of medical professionals willing to whore themselves out in the name of money. These patients need to be protected from themselves, not coddled, appeased, and entered into an experimental surgical procedure for which no data is being generated.
I’m a doctor who isn’t desperate to fill my schedule in order to keep the expensive interventional-radiology machine running. Still, this article makes me ashamed of my profession.
— Dave
Thank you for being so very understanding, Dave. Do the initials FOAD ring any bells, Dave?
From later in the page:
Re: For those identifying themselves as physicians,
I’d be curious to know what kind of physicians they are. Also if they are going to identify themselves as physicians, in other words holding themselves out as authorities, wouldn’t it be nice if they would identify themselves? Are they afraid of something or are they just not what/who they say they are?
— Jan