This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Knowledge & Support Community

CCSVIhusband wrote:According to their logic codefellow ... that is correct. I'm sure they'll spin that statement and move the line once again!

While you are not a very likable person I do like to see people enjoying themselves and for that reason I, and I think most everyone else, is glad you've never been capable of realizing that you're on the losing end of every conversation.

Shortly ago you (incorrectly) berated someone for using a magazine article as a not authoritative enough reference, yet everyone else is nitpicking when you repeatedly are "just a little off" on your facts?

Let's come clean. You're trying to to make the pro CCSVI camp look incompetent, aren't you?

^ spin ... and BS ...

you don't know me, nor if I'm likable. I'm quite sure, you're not likable. (in fact your interactions with past posters on this site who now only post about you on Facebook ... confirm that). EDIT - I'm pretty sure you're on Santa's naughty list.

I don't research every post, just try to reference people back to things. (EDIT - sometimes I refer to the wrong things, and that's OK because it's not my job to post on an MS forum like I suspect it is for some of the "skeptics" ... I have a real job). Reading cheer's studies is a lot more important than your petty arguments. I think everyone knows that.

The CCSVI tidal wave is building ... can't wait until it sweeps you away from this site!

Everyone else (according to Lyon) ... notice how they (the self described skeptics) never answer to the things actually asked, posted about, or in question. They always conveniently change the subject as to not be cornered and have to be held accountable for their statements? It's rather amusing. They know cheer's research is out there though ... oh and also notice how they don't challenge Dr. Sclafani with their BS statements they try to challenge everyone else with? because they know he'd burn their little playhouse down?

^^ I rest my case!

What does that prove? That you and your skeptic buddies are dragging down another thread about CCSVI? Great ... good post. You win now! You're so smart and sexy Bob ...

I'll let you continue though. We all see through you (especially everyone who has been liberated or has had loved ones liberated).

CCSVIhusband wrote:What does that prove? That you and your skeptic buddies are dragging down another thread about CCSVI?

Excellent point!

With it in mind that you would never drag a thread down with nonsense, please confirm your position on a higher plain to any doubters by linking us to the last piece of useful information YOU have posted here at thisisms. I have confidence in you and know that you won't stoop to the level of the 5 nasty skeptics and respond with some BS spin.

OK, we're ready.........................

You can be happy that 5 skeptics keep this forum active, because it would have already sunk in the backwater of false promises and lost hopes. Only a few fools think that the world revolves around them, others are aware of the laws of the universe.
The Liberation spark time has passed, those who have caught the last train still regret ...But remorse is in them, publicly they are too ashamed to express it. Searching for hope in restenosis ... and they are only the more deeply buried in the mud with no way out.
The solution is to turn to yourselves, living the life you deserve, to spend money on family and friends: MS is not a disease to die of. Just live yours life. Do not pay a quack for a false promise - them in mind is only their business, not your well-being.

rules of the board

If you disagree with someone, please succinctly state why and let it go at that. Point, counterpoint, counter-counter point, etc. is not useful-- the reality is that after the first disagreement, you will rarely convince another of something they feel strongly about unless you have shocking new information to share. The drawn-out debates also turn people off from reading the messages in the first place. If you really have to get something off your chest, please send that person a Private Message-- there is no need to have a long argument in public.