Page 5 of 8
ccsvi
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2011 3:03 pm
by blossom
frodo, please don't be sorry you invited dr. flanagan to that site. i thought it was very interesting and if discussed in more length i thought things were gonna really start to come together.
but it seems that some things never change. as much as it has to.
i'm really really sick of being branded when as we all know it will take the village to make us well.
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2011 3:13 pm
by SaintLouis
Dr. Sclafani,
Please don't give up on your experiment, I for one was very excited at the thought of the opportunity to be a "fly on the wall" and listen and learn from your discussions about specific cases with other IR's. From the start I assumed that was what the thread was to be about.
This doesn't mean I as a patient am not open to hearing many views from many specialties - I've followed Dr. F's thread with interest, but this specific thread I thought was to be about veins and the people who work IN them.
Simple solution: Change the title of your thread to specify IR docs and problem solved. Then if someone wants to start a multi-specialty think-tank thread (which I also think would be grand) they can do so and that might be a better place for some of the recent conversation tangents.
ccsvi
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2011 3:31 pm
by blossom
rn, i know and you know that dr.'s only were to be on that thread. myself i have no desire or thoughts that you should be taken to the woodshed and punished.
first you are an rn, so, i assume you have an idea of the human body.
you, are a living specimen of a human being that has symptoms they call ms-you went and had angioplasty and you got zip!
you learned about dr. flanagan started treatments and are getting good results.
you are living proof that perhaps the cart is being put before the horse in some cases. i'm sure you are wondering how much better your outcome may have been if you had been examined and treated by dr. flanagan's protocol first and then got the ccsvi treatment if still needed. i know i am wondering that "big time" concerning my experience with ccsvi treatment.
i still have hopes even though they have been dashed that all these dr.'s begin working together soon.
thanks again for putting your personal experience out there.
the very best to you. i look forward to hearing of your future improvements.
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2011 3:46 pm
by MrSuccess
It might benefit all ..... to drop the ongoing debate ..... as nothing good can come of it .
True Story : Mr. Success had a sore throat . After several day's ..... he sought out the services of his doctor. The good doctor examined Mr. Success ..... then recommended Mr. Success see a dentist .
Mr. Success sought out the services of a Dentist ..... who then removed Mr. Success's wisdom teeth [ please .... no wise cracks ...
]
Problem solved ..... no more sore throat.
Lesson Learned : You never know which Specialty can help you best.
Let's keep ALL the doors and windows open ..... to let in all the knowledge made available to solve the great mystery of MS.
Mr. Success
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:02 pm
by civickiller
One of the reasons I started UCC is to correct everything before I get liberated so I don't restenosis. Maybe dr. F sees things that might cause or is causing problems which after getting liberated might cause problems.
The dr's might be looking at his theories as if it were a foreign language
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:08 pm
by scorpion
civickiller wrote:One of the reasons I started UCC is to correct everything before I get liberated so I don't restenosis. Maybe dr. F sees things that might cause or is causing problems which after getting liberated might cause problems.
The dr's looking at it might be like looking at a foreign language to them so they don't understand it
A foreign language created by Zamboni that so far resembles some sort of hieroglyphics that everyone translates differently.
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2011 8:02 am
by Cece
drsclafani wrote:Cece wrote:HappyPoet wrote:Distal from the brain or from the heart?
Am I wrong in thinking that each doctor's definition of "distal" (and "proximal") needs to be clarified?
Here is where Dr. Cumming defined proximal:
http://www.thisisms.com/ftopicp-148594.html#148594
the proper terminology is central, peripheral. There is little confusion with this. Central meaning closer to the center or heart, peripheral meaning away from the heart
This is nonintuitive as an MS patient. We are used to our central nervous system and our peripheral nervous system! (Central close to the brain, peripheral further from it.) It's all in one's perspective, isn't it. I like our heart guys more than our brain guys anyways, I can use these terms.
"Ostium" is a new one to me too: mouth or opening of the vein.
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2011 11:49 am
by Billmeik
trying to figure out why embedding this image works for me and not Dr. Cummings. Im thinking the spaces.?
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2011 11:53 am
by pairOdime
How about an 18mm x 4cm Atlas from 14-20 atms.....I wonder. Although, 18mm may be considered for the right IJV only. Interested to see what the doctors determine on this one.
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:04 pm
by Billmeik
ok dr cummings pics are embedded fine. UprightDoc has a quote in his last post that starts with a [/quote] which is for closing.
I wish people would correct my mistakes for me!
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:15 pm
by Cece
pairOdime wrote:How about an 18mm x 4cm Atlas from 14-20 atms.....I wonder.
Interested to see what the doctors determine on this one.
yes, I am curious too! Higher pressures, bigger balloon sizes? Dr. Sclafani actually went up to 40 atm on the case where the ivus pictures were corrupted. That's higher than I'd have expected. No rupture.
Dr. Cumming has talked about concerns about intimal hyperplasia as a result of aggressive ballooning so a short-term course of Plavix or aspirin in addition to the Lovenox might be reasonable.
Still looking forward to Dr. Sclafani posting the "after" images of his case when he is back from iset, but thank you Dr. Cumming for giving us something to look at in the meantime.
Re: Dr. Sclafani
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2011 9:13 pm
by soapdiva884
RN wrote:Dr. Sclafani said:
" I want to know what my peers think about the venograms and how they would approach treatment."
If that is the reason for posting a case study on TIMS, then perhaps you are unaware that the endovascular MD's have a professional site specifically for that purpose. The discussion is very high level and focused on the imaging and procedures involving all the veins in the body. They have a specific CCSVI thread for your purpose. If your intent is truly to engage your peers, that is the place to reach them.
Dr. Sclafani said:
" I enjoy dr flanagans theories and have picked up some insights from him. I dont know how correct or valid they are but i listen.
but it doesnt help ME when the discussion stays on the spine. Dr Flanagan could start his own thread on treatment if he wanted. "
If Dr. Flanagan's input does not help you, perhaps you would consider reading the anatomy and physiology in his book. It might help you understand the relationship of venous drainage to total fluid dynamics. Your work with veins only affects part of the overall head and neck drainage issues. You are dealing with one piece of the puzzle and it is conceivable that opening veins prior to upper cervical study and possible treatment may be placing the cart before the horse.
Dr. Sclafani stated:
"But to be fair and honest, he was invited"
Yes, he was and I found some of your comments to be dismissive and denegrating. Your responses to Dr. Flanagan's comments had the tone of a pissing match. Please be more respectful.
No, I am not a doctor of any sort. I am an RN.
Oh for God's sake! You have only posted two comments and this has to be one of them?? "pissing match" "please be more respectful"............It seems to me that if you want to get your point across, you probably should NOT cuss and NOT demand respect. You are not talking to a toddler, you are talking to a peer who is an adult!
OK, so my take on this is whether the thread was intended for one thing or another you all KNOW how it goes here. This is bound to happen, people will feel intruded upon and others will feel the need to defend the supposed intruder.
I believe that there are MANY pieces to this crazy puzzle of MS and CCSVI. We need to hear it all, learn it all and share it all. So, if someone wants to join the physician thread, let him or her providing they are a professional. We don't have to read what they have to say if we are not interested or impressed.
There is never a reason for cussing or disrespect of our fellow peers EVER! We all need to remember we are in this TOGETHER!
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2011 11:30 am
by drsclafani
Cece wrote:
Still looking forward to Dr. Sclafani posting the "after" images of his case when he is back from iset, but thank you Dr. Cumming for giving us something to look at in the meantime.
its posted now, cece. Other doctors are also joining. If you knew who some of them were you would be very much surprised
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2011 11:36 am
by L
drsclafani wrote:Cece wrote:
Still looking forward to Dr. Sclafani posting the "after" images of his case when he is back from iset, but thank you Dr. Cumming for giving us something to look at in the meantime.
its posted now, cece. Other doctors are also joining. If you knew who some of them were you would be very much surprised
Dr. Mark Freedman??
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2011 1:08 pm
by Cece
L wrote:drsclafani wrote:Cece wrote:
Still looking forward to Dr. Sclafani posting the "after" images of his case when he is back from iset, but thank you Dr. Cumming for giving us something to look at in the meantime.
its posted now, cece. Other doctors are also joining. If you knew who some of them were you would be very much surprised
Dr. Mark Freedman??
It's good that my family is in the basement and I am on the second floor because it can be embarrassing when I burst out laughing like that.
