Page 2 of 2

Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2011 6:23 pm
by HarryZ
I believe that generally speaking science(specifically medicine) does not need to be marketed but instead proven through rigorous testing AFTER which it can be said to either be "good" or "bad" science.
Then why do drug companies spend millions of dollars more on marketing than they ever spend on research? A classic example is how Biogen marketed Tysabri in the beginning.

Gee Scorpion, I hope your comment was more of how it "should be" in medicine as opposed to how it "really is"!

Harry

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 3:19 am
by jgalt2009
Now penis enlargement is something I could get behind. Not that I need it or anything. :-)