Kirsty Duncan interview on Canadian study announcement...
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:53 pm
Ahhh, my hero this lady, she never fails to tell it like it is...
Trying to imagine CCSVI in Canada without her presence...We all owe her an eternal debt of gratitude...
(More at link)
http://www.ccsvi.nl/prikbord/Direct.asp ... ost:227495
Kirsty Duncan: I’m encouraged that at least a first step has been taken. Up to now we have had only announcements and no timeframe for action, no lead for the trials, so this is encouraging. I am concerned that this is not a Pan-Canadian trial in multi-centres with a large number of patient participants. The country has been miniaturized. There are a number of questions that need to be answered. For example, are the health professionals who will participate in the trials adequately trained and experienced? There is a huge learning curve involved and experienced IRs who are doing the procedure say that it takes 100 or more procedures for them to feel comfortable and to know the ins and outs of the treatment. How will patients be monitored? What are the criteria for determining adverse events? There are many details we don’t know.
CCSVI Ontario: What is your reaction to Dr. Anthony Traboulsee, an MS neurologist, being named as the lead in the clinical trials?
Kirsty Duncan: I have heard from many Canadians, doctors and people with MS, and there is great concern for the potential of negative bias. There is real concern. Frankly, if this is to be a double blinded, trial then all project investigators must be blinded.
CCSVI Ontario: What do you think the impact of the Minister’s announcement will be on the Senate Committee that will begin hearings on Bill S-204 on Thursday, 4 October?
Kirsty Duncan: I had no doubt that there would be an announcement of some sort a week or so before the hearings on Bill S-204. The Minister of Health has been playing politics with people’s lives from the beginning. The Minister went to extraordinary lengths to kill Bill C-280 and it would not surprise me if the aim of the Minister’s 28 September announcement is to limit consideration of Bill S-204 in the Senate.
It is interesting to note, however, that Bill C-280 was deliberately killed in the House but just a few short weeks later Bill S-204 passed second reading in the Senate and was sent to Committee. The Bills are the same; I wrote Bill C-280 but could not table it before the House adjourned in June 2011. Senator Cordy graciously took the bill and tabled it in the Senate.
CCSVI Ontario: What is your reaction to Canadians with CCSVI/MS not being allowed to appear as witnesses in front of the Senate Committee?
Kirsty Duncan: I think it is outrageous. This same Committee heard from people struggling with mental health issues when they discussed mental health; they heard from victims when they discussed crime; why are the voices of Canadians with CCSVI/MS being shut down now? Why do Canadians with CCSVI/MS always have to fight their government and their disease? Why are the people charged with representing them refusing to hear from them?
Trying to imagine CCSVI in Canada without her presence...We all owe her an eternal debt of gratitude...
(More at link)
http://www.ccsvi.nl/prikbord/Direct.asp ... ost:227495
Kirsty Duncan: I’m encouraged that at least a first step has been taken. Up to now we have had only announcements and no timeframe for action, no lead for the trials, so this is encouraging. I am concerned that this is not a Pan-Canadian trial in multi-centres with a large number of patient participants. The country has been miniaturized. There are a number of questions that need to be answered. For example, are the health professionals who will participate in the trials adequately trained and experienced? There is a huge learning curve involved and experienced IRs who are doing the procedure say that it takes 100 or more procedures for them to feel comfortable and to know the ins and outs of the treatment. How will patients be monitored? What are the criteria for determining adverse events? There are many details we don’t know.
CCSVI Ontario: What is your reaction to Dr. Anthony Traboulsee, an MS neurologist, being named as the lead in the clinical trials?
Kirsty Duncan: I have heard from many Canadians, doctors and people with MS, and there is great concern for the potential of negative bias. There is real concern. Frankly, if this is to be a double blinded, trial then all project investigators must be blinded.
CCSVI Ontario: What do you think the impact of the Minister’s announcement will be on the Senate Committee that will begin hearings on Bill S-204 on Thursday, 4 October?
Kirsty Duncan: I had no doubt that there would be an announcement of some sort a week or so before the hearings on Bill S-204. The Minister of Health has been playing politics with people’s lives from the beginning. The Minister went to extraordinary lengths to kill Bill C-280 and it would not surprise me if the aim of the Minister’s 28 September announcement is to limit consideration of Bill S-204 in the Senate.
It is interesting to note, however, that Bill C-280 was deliberately killed in the House but just a few short weeks later Bill S-204 passed second reading in the Senate and was sent to Committee. The Bills are the same; I wrote Bill C-280 but could not table it before the House adjourned in June 2011. Senator Cordy graciously took the bill and tabled it in the Senate.
CCSVI Ontario: What is your reaction to Canadians with CCSVI/MS not being allowed to appear as witnesses in front of the Senate Committee?
Kirsty Duncan: I think it is outrageous. This same Committee heard from people struggling with mental health issues when they discussed mental health; they heard from victims when they discussed crime; why are the voices of Canadians with CCSVI/MS being shut down now? Why do Canadians with CCSVI/MS always have to fight their government and their disease? Why are the people charged with representing them refusing to hear from them?