| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
MrsGeorge Family Elder

Joined: Dec 11, 2007 Posts: 244
|
Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2008 2:39 am Post subject: Optic Neuritis |
|
|
I am fairly convinced that I have optic neuritis again but in my left eye this time. I have had pain on movement and a noticible change to my vision (blurriness) for a couple of weeks and have now reached the point where the pain is constant and the accompanying headache is no better.
Unfortunately as I still have not had a dx or have even met my current neuro I don't know what to do. I am due to see him on thursday but since my last 2 appointments were postponed last minute there is no guarentee. In addition the pain is pretty much constant - within mins of getting out of bed today I had a headache (that I associate with ON based on my previous ON). I just want to make it go away but I don't know how or what to do. Last time I had ON it took weeks to get a referral from my GP and they didn't give me any treatment anyway. This time I am in a different NHS trust but I don't know what they do.
Any advice would be appreciated - especially from those with NHS experience. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
g123 Family Member

Joined: Mar 27, 2008 Posts: 31
|
Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2008 8:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi MrsGeorge,
I believe that if you've had it for 2 weeks already they'd tell you it is too late to treat it with steroids at this point, and I don't know of other treatments for ON.
I hope you feel better soon. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MrsGeorge Family Elder

Joined: Dec 11, 2007 Posts: 244
|
Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2008 9:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| thanks - the joys of being under the NHS and never being able to see a doctor in reasonable time for anything! It's only been this bad for about 2 days but I have been wondering for a couple of weeks if it was ON developing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Muu Family Elder

Joined: Aug 01, 2006 Posts: 183 Location: London
|
Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2008 4:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi there
yes, i,m a Londoner and in the nhs system. I've had ON a few times over the last 20 years and received treatment neither time. Each time it subsided over a few weeks. Fortunately, no pain on any occasion and eyesight not adversely affected once the initial symptoms of ON subsided. If you want to know for sure and are unhappy about waiting for a referral from your GP to see a neurologist then you could always think about asking an optician. Mine can see some scarring/paleness on the back of the eyes as a result of the ON. If you tell him/her your suspicions perhaps they can provide some info altho am sure they will tell you to get to a neurologist sap.
muu |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AllyB Family Elder

Joined: Apr 23, 2007 Posts: 340
|
Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2008 4:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi there
I was brought up in the UK (no longer there though) - how about going to your closest A&E, giving them a brief history, and explaining about your ON - it could be seen as an emergency - worst case, folks have lost their sight - and I am sure they could give you some high dose iv steroids to help you along. Otherwise, is your GP not kitted out to do some iv steroids in his rooms? Or he could even give you oral steroids, though I don't believe they work as well, they are better than nothing.
I think it is important that you get some help, and it must be so frustrating to have to wait and be uncertain when a scary thing like this happens. I realize that it might be mild, but treatment might help.
Best of luck. _________________ Ali |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MrsGeorge Family Elder

Joined: Dec 11, 2007 Posts: 244
|
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2008 6:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for your replies.
I finally managed to get hold of my GP today who sent me straight to the eye casualty at the local hospital (i left work without telling my manager cos he wasn't there - eek). Anyways - I waited an hour and then got to see a nurse who made me read a letters chart (and I did way less good than normal) and flicked a penlight at my eyes from a short distance for maybe 30 secs and then told me that she didn't think it was ON as the symptoms were wrong (the exact same symptoms as I had last time I had ON). And anyway (she told me) they already had 10 people waiting to see the morning doctor and there wasn't an afternoon one - so she made me an appointment to come back tomorrow at 11am (odd cos she told me it wasn't likely to be ON but she was concerned enough to put me in the first available appointment).
I now need to get more time off work - I only started this job last week and I have been out of the office more often than I have been in! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Loriyas Family Elder

Joined: Apr 03, 2006 Posts: 318 Location: Naples, FL
|
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2008 10:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I'm sorry you are having to go through this. It is my understanding that a doctor has a special instrument which can see the optic nerve. I thought that was the only way ON could be diagnosed. That is probably why she made the appointment for you to go back tomorrow. At least you have that! But she should have made arrangements so that you could have been seen today. How frustrating! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MrsGeorge Family Elder

Joined: Dec 11, 2007 Posts: 244
|
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 5:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
I got the dx of ON today - just got back from the hospital. He is not giving me any steroids etc as 90% of cases clear up without treatment. If there's no improvement when I go back in 2 weeks then he will look at drugs.
Does this count as a relapse? Or is it just one of those things? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lyon Family Elder

Joined: May 04, 2006 Posts: 3403 Location: Mid-Michigan
|
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 6:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| MrsGeorge wrote: | | Does this count as a relapse? Or is it just one of those things? | It's probably considered controversial because some don't consider ON a direct result of MS, but logic dictates that confirmation of optic neuritis in someone diagnosed with MS would be an exacerbation/relapse, considering that the brain/spine/optic nerves compose the CNS.
All it wouldn't be/might not be is a lesion producing situation, which makes me realize for the first time that I have NEVER heard mention of sighting lesion on the optic nerves???? That's certainly something to look into.
Bob _________________ Wife diagnosed with MS in Feb. 2006 and is a participant in the Tovaxin IIb clinical trial. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
g123 Family Member

Joined: Mar 27, 2008 Posts: 31
|
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 6:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="Lyon"] | MrsGeorge wrote: | | It's probably considered controversial because some don't consider ON a direct result of MS |
really? then what relationship is it considered to have? i know you can get ON from a virus attacking the optic nerve or something, and not have MS. And I suppose it is technically possible to be a person with MS, and coincidentally get ON due to a factor unrelated to the MS disease process.
but if you take that minute percentage out, people with MS obviously get ON way more than people who don't have MS. there are people saying the ON is not a result of the MS? or a "direct" result?
any links to more on this viewpoint? i'm curious... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lyon Family Elder

Joined: May 04, 2006 Posts: 3403 Location: Mid-Michigan
|
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 12:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| g123 wrote: | | Lyon wrote: | | MrsGeorge wrote: | | It's probably considered controversial because some don't consider ON a direct result of MS |
really? then what relationship is it considered to have? i know you can get ON from a virus attacking the optic nerve or something, and not have MS. And I suppose it is technically possible to be a person with MS, and coincidentally get ON due to a factor unrelated to the MS disease process.
but if you take that minute percentage out, people with MS obviously get ON way more than people who don't have MS. there are people saying the ON is not a result of the MS? or a "direct" result?
any links to more on this viewpoint? i'm curious... | |
I'll look for links to send you. Many of them exist, but it sounds that you have a good grasp of the factors in the meantime......ON isn't always specific to MS which causes some people doubt whether MS is directly responsible for ON when it is associated with MS. .
In a way the doubters are right. Until something is conclusively proven it can't be considered absolutely certain but no conclusive evidence has ever presented itself to MS research so you have to go with what the circumstantial evidence makes seem the most likely.
Bob _________________ Wife diagnosed with MS in Feb. 2006 and is a participant in the Tovaxin IIb clinical trial. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
g123 Family Member

Joined: Mar 27, 2008 Posts: 31
|
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 3:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i see. that makes sense. but then again, by that logic many syptoms of MS are circumstantial
the main reason this surprised me is that I've spoken to a number of people who were diagnosed when their ONLY symptom was ON (+ a positive MRI). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lyon Family Elder

Joined: May 04, 2006 Posts: 3403 Location: Mid-Michigan
|
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 4:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| g123 wrote: | i see. that makes sense. but then again, by that logic many syptoms of MS are circumstantial
the main reason this surprised me is that I've spoken to a number of people who were diagnosed when their ONLY symptom was ON (+ a positive MRI). | I think you just mentioned the main defining point of the issue, and that is the positive MRI. The difference between the other symptoms of MS is that in someone previously diagnosed with MS, those symptoms (for better or worse) are automatically attributed to the positive MRI, where ON can be a stand alone ailment without showing lesions, which causes doubters to question if it is directly attributable to MS.
Bob _________________ Wife diagnosed with MS in Feb. 2006 and is a participant in the Tovaxin IIb clinical trial.
Last edited by Lyon on Sat Apr 19, 2008 7:50 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
EyeDoc Family Member

Joined: May 12, 2006 Posts: 89 Location: Texas, USA
|
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 9:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
It is frustrating to read your post. Everything you describe in terms of symptoms and your MS screams "OPTIC NEURITIS HERE!". Aside from being in London for a week and loving every bit of it, I have no experience with the UK or the UK's medical system. That being said, it seems that you are not receiving the prompt treatment that you need. Yes, the ON is a relapse. There is no reason to assume otherwise. You need quick treatment with IV and oral steroids to stop the inflammation as quickly as possible to shorten the course of the inflammation and to hopefully lessen the permanent damage to the nerve that it can cause.
I am glad you are receiving treatment now. Good luck, and if this reoccurs in the future, pester your medical care providers and get treatment  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Grumpster Family Elder

Joined: Aug 02, 2006 Posts: 119 Location: S. California
|
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 11:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grumpster here, I have wicked ON and it has gone fromm one eye to the other and never fully abated. You need steroids as soon as possible, not in a couple of more weeks. They only work during active inflamation and may prevent optic nerve scarring and permanent vision damage. I wne through the same type of BS here in the US with my HMO before I was actually diagnosed with MS. Be persistant. I threatened legal recourse before they said ok with the steroids and the roids did help. Waiting may cause serious damage. I know I have permanent damage in both eyes and the headaches I attribute to times when it is real bad are enough to sink a battleship.
I wish you the best. Your tale is a good argument against nationalized healthcare as two of the presidential contenders here want. ON is my worst symptom and I hope your's is one of the ones that go away completely in short order.
G |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|