Welcome to This Is MS!

     Modules
· Home
· Content
· Downloads
· Encyclopedia
· FAQ
· Feedback
· Forums
· Journal
· Private Messages
· Recommend Us
· Search
· Site_Map
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

     Google
Google
Web
This is MS
These ads help pay for the upkeep of our site. They are automatically served by Google and are not affiliated with This is MS.

     Languages
Select Interface Language:


     Who's Online
There are currently, 34 guest(s) and 2 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

     Next Step

From the creators of This is MS comes Experience Project

EP is a community where members connect through shared life experiences-- like MS--and so much more. You are not defined by any one thing, so be your true self and find others just like you at Experience Project.

Get started by sharing your Multiple Sclerosis story.


     Donations

To remain unbiased, This is MS does not accept corporate sponsorships.

Therefore, we must rely on our users to help support us. Please donate to our upkeep if you have the means. Thank you!


ThisIsMS.com :: View topic - RE: evidence about long term efficacy of CRABS
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 


RE: evidence about long term efficacy of CRABS

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ThisIsMS.com Forum Index -> Drug Pipeline
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
jazzcat
Family Member


Joined: Apr 14, 2004
Posts: 30

PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 6:42 pm    Post subject: RE: evidence about long term efficacy of CRABS Reply with quote

Hi all,

Just curious. I am on Rebif and have been stable with no relapses and no new symptoms for 5 years! YAY!

I have heard from some fellow people with MS who choose to go drug free that Rebif and Avonex are effective only in the first couple of years and then lose their effectiveness.

I am on the web exploring this idea. Any thoughts or links to articles that might set me on a path to greater understanding?

Thanks in advance for your responses!
jazzcat
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dignan
Family Elder


Joined: Aug 12, 2004
Posts: 1186

PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 9:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here are a few abstracts that might be helpful. I don't know if the full articles are freely available...I also don't know why the Italians are so interested in this stuff...


PRISMS-4: Long-term efficacy of interferon-beta-1a in relapsing MS.

Neurology. 2001 Jun 26;56(12):1628-36.
PRISMS Study Group and the University of British Columbia MS/MRI Analysis Group..

BACKGROUND: The PRISMS study demonstrated significant clinical and MRI benefit at 2 years for interferon-beta-1a, 22 and 44 mcg thrice weekly (tiw), compared with placebo in relapsing-remitting MS. Years 3 and 4 extension study results are reported.

METHODS: Patients initially receiving placebo were randomized to blinded interferon-beta-1a, 22 or 44 mcg tiw (n = 172; crossover group); others continued blinded treatment with their originally assigned dose, 22 mcg (Rx22 group) or 44 mcg (Rx44 group) tiw (n = 167 per group). Patients had 3- to 6-month clinical and annual MRI assessments.

RESULTS: Relapse rates for 4 years were 1.02 (crossover), 0.80 (Rx22, p < 0.001), and 0.72 (Rx44, p < 0.001); the dose effect approached significance (p = 0.069; risk ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.76-1.01). Crossover groups showed reductions in relapse count, MRI activity, and lesion-burden accumulation with interferon-beta-1a compared with their placebo period (p < 0.001 both doses). Time to sustained disability progression was prolonged by 18 months in the Rx44 group compared with the crossover group (p = 0.047). Rx22 and Rx44 reduced new T2 lesion number and lesion burden compared with crossover (p < 0.001); Rx44 was superior to Rx22 on several clinical and MRI outcomes. Persistent neutralizing antibodies developed in 14.3% (Rx44) and 23.7% (Rx22) of patients and were associated with reduced efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS: Clinical and MRI benefit continued for both doses up to 4 years, with evidence of dose response. Outcomes were consistently better for patients treated for 4 years than for patients in crossover groups. Efficacy decreased with neutralizing antibody formation.

Pubmed link


High-dose, frequently administered interferon beta therapy for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis must be maintained over the long term: the interferon beta dose-reduction study.

J Neurol Sci. 2004 Jul 15;222(1-2):13-9.
Barbero P, Verdun E, Bergui M, Pipieri A, Clerico M, Cucci A, Ricci A, Bergamasco B, Durelli L.
Divisione di Neurologia, Ospedale San Luigi Gonzaga, Regione Gonzole, Via Cherasco, 15, 10-I 10043 Orbassano, Turin, Italy.

Long-term trials have demonstrated the continued efficacy of interferon (IFN) beta treatment in patients with relapsing-remitting (RR) multiple sclerosis (MS) during prolonged administration. The objective of the work was to evaluate the effects of reducing IFN beta administration frequency and total weekly dose in patients with RR MS who have achieved clinical and MRI disease activity stabilization during long-term IFN beta-1b treatment. Prospective 1-year follow-up of 27 RR MS patients on long-term 250 microg every other day (standard dose) IFN beta-1b treatment were randomized either to gradually reduce dose to 30 microg once-a-week IFN beta-1a (13 patients), or to continue on IFN beta-1b standard dose (14 patients).

We found significant differences in the two group of patients. In the group of patients continuously treated with IFN beta-1b standard dose, 79% remained relapse free compared to 23% in the group receiving once-weekly IFN beta-1a (p=0.006). The number of patients without new PD/T2 lesions was higher in the group of patients continuously treated with IFN beta-1b standard dose (77%) compared to the once-weekly IFN beta-1a group (23%) (p=0.04). IFN beta is a long-term treatment for MS. The reduction of IFN beta-1b administration frequency and dose is not advisable even in patients free from clinical and MRI disease activity for many years.

Pubmed link


Effects of interferon beta-1a and -1b over time: 6-year results of an observational head-to-head study.

Acta Neurol Scand. 2006 Apr;113(4):241-7.
Patti F, Pappalardo A, Florio C, Politi G, Fiorilla T, Reggio E, Reggio A.
Centro Sclerosi Multipla, Universitą di Catania, Catania, Italy. patti@unict.it

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the long-term efficacy and safety of two different beta-interferon preparations (IFN-beta-1a vs IFN-beta-1b).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two parallel outpatient groups with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), according to Poser criteria, were treated with either intramuscular IFN-beta-1a 30 microg (group A, n = 62) or subcutaneous IFN-beta-1b 250 microg (group B, n = 64).

RESULTS: A statistically significant reduction was seen in the relapse rate (P < 0.0001) in both groups. No significant difference was found between the two groups (P = 0.43). After 6 years of therapy, the mean Expanded Disability Status Scale score was 3.22 +/- 1.47 (delta 1.03 +/- 1.35) in group A and 3.34 +/- 1.47 (delta 0.97 +/- 1.47) in group B (P = 0.47).

CONCLUSIONS: Our study results suggest that the efficacy of IFN-beta-1a 30 microg once weekly and SC IFN-beta-1b 250 microg every other day is similar. Both IFN-beta-1a and IFN-beta-1b are effective in slowing disability progression.

Pubmed link


Long-term clinical experience with weekly interferon beta-1a in relapsing multiple sclerosis.

Eur J Neurol. 2006 Sep;13(9):1014-21.
Coppola G, Lanzillo R, Florio C, Orefice G, Vivo P, Ascione S, Schiavone V, Pagano A, Vacca G, De Michele G, Morra VB.
Department of Neurological Sciences, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.

Post-marketing surveillance studies are needed to assess the long-term safety, compliance and clinical efficacy of interferon beta-1a (IFNbeta-1a) therapy in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. The goals of this study were to (i) assess the safety, compliance and clinical efficacy of long-term intramuscular (i.m.) IFNbeta-1a therapy in a large cohort of patients, and (ii) suggest possible predictors of therapeutic response. A total of 255 patients were included in the study. Mean time on therapy was 31.7 +/- 19.3 months.

Within 3 years, 31% of patients discontinued treatment, mainly for disease activity. No significant sustained blood analysis alteration was observed over time, apart from a decrease of cholesterol levels. After 3 years of treatment, mean Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores increased by 0.4 points compared with baseline. The mean annual relapse rate was reduced compared with baseline. Patients with < or = 2 relapses in the previous 2 years and with baseline EDSS scores of < or = 2 had a longer estimated time to first relapse and to progression and first relapse, respectively. These results confirm the safety and suggest a sustained effectiveness of i.m. IFNbeta-1a, extending the reported follow-up period to 6.3 years, and hypothesize the presence of possible predictors of clinical outcome.

Pubmed link
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jazzcat
Family Member


Joined: Apr 14, 2004
Posts: 30

PostPosted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 6:40 pm    Post subject: thanks for posting Reply with quote

Hey, Dignan,

Thanks for posting the information. It helps settle my mind.

jazzcat
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ThisIsMS.com Forum Index -> Drug Pipeline All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum





Personal Stories about millions of life experience--including multiple sclerosis support, lupus support, depression support . Built by the This is MS team.

Anonymous Confessions | Dream Dictionary
Site Map

This site does not offer medical advice. All treatment decisions should always be made with the full consent of your physician.


Visit our sister site dedicated to Inflammatory Bowel Disease: This is IBD


All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owners. The comments are property of their posters, quoted articles are © referenced source, all the rest © 2002 by thisisMS.com.
PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.
Page Generation: 0.16 Seconds