
Anna
So sorry, Anna. My husband's doppler seemed to be OK, but he had already had an MRV which showed serious stenosis in both his jugulars, so we knew he had CCSVI. The doppler couldn't go high enough to see the reflux. He needed a transcranial doppler, and that wasn't available where he was tested. This is a problem. The 1% number being diagnosed isn't even close. From incidental reports here and in Zamboni's papers, the number is closer to 90% of MS patients showing CCSVI.bestadmom wrote:Anna,
Ted is absolutely correct. The transcranial doppler, which sees the veins inside the skull up behind the ear is what they need to use to make a complete assessment. The azygous isn't measured with the doppler.
Maybe your jugulars aren't occluded in your neck, but that is just a small portion of the anatomy that needs to be studied. If it was simple, every doppler operator could diagnose ccsvi. There are only a few people in the world who are trained on the transcranial doppler right now, but the manufacturer in Italy is training people starting this week.
Fear not Anna, I had the same tech as Joan's dearest, same machine, same "slammed shut" jugulars, and got a copy of the negative "nothing at all to see here" ultrasound, and there ISN'T anything to see. It's the equipment, and secondarily the training. Shiny machines do not a good Ultrasound make. Most their bread and butter is off babys anyways. They won't turn you away, and you can't "argue" with their results, it's a win/win for THEM.cheerleader wrote:bestadmom wrote: So sorry, Anna. My husband's doppler seemed to be OK, but he had already had an MRV which showed serious stenosis in both his jugulars, so we knew he had CCSVI. The doppler couldn't go high enough to see the reflux. He needed a transcranial doppler, and that wasn't available where he was tested. This is a problem. The 1% number being diagnosed isn't even close. From incidental reports here and in Zamboni's papers, the number is closer to 90% of MS patients showing CCSVI.
good luck-
cheer