MISDIAGNOSIS

If it's on your mind and it has to do with multiple sclerosis in any way, post it here.
Post Reply
User avatar
dania
Family Elder
Posts: 1088
Joined: 8 years ago
Location: St Lazare Quebec

MISDIAGNOSIS

Post by dania » 7 years ago


PointsNorth
Family Elder
Posts: 683
Joined: 12 years ago
Location: LeftCoast Canada
Contact:

Re: MISDIAGNOSIS

Post by PointsNorth » 7 years ago

Just a blood test to rule it in/out.

PN
Albany 2010. Brooklyn 2011
Hayes inspired Calcitriol+D3 2013-2014
Coimbra Protocol 2014-16
DrG B12 Transdermal Spray 2014-16
Progesterone 2015-16
Low-Dose Immunotherapy 2015-16
My Current Regimen http://www.thisisms.com/forum/regimens-f22/topic25634.html

Sunnee
Family Member
Posts: 85
Joined: 7 years ago

Re: MISDIAGNOSIS

Post by Sunnee » 7 years ago

dania


This is what I have been trying to say all along, there are so many crossovers, Lyme, lupas, hughes syndrome, misaligned atlas, Candida, chronic fatigue syndrome and i imagine others too, all of these have been misdiagnosed at some point.

Wow great info.

Thanx

Sunnee

User avatar
frodo
Family Elder
Posts: 1174
Joined: 9 years ago
Contact:

Re: MISDIAGNOSIS

Post by frodo » 7 years ago

PointsNorth wrote:Just a blood test to rule it in/out.

PN
It is not so easy. In fact there is no consensus about what MS is. There is no formal definition of the condition, and according to the (awful) McDonald criteria you have MS if you have marks in you MRI that you cannot explain. Of course, other doctors use other definitions.

The problem is not a lack of a test. The problem is a lack of consensus about which condition(s) should be named MS. You can rule out MS with the blood test, but still you get no information from a NMO-negative test.

Anyway, any person ever diagnosed with MS should have a blood test for NMO. And again MS associations are doing nothing to fix this problem.

User avatar
cheerleader
Family Elder
Posts: 5359
Joined: 11 years ago
Location: southern California
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: MISDIAGNOSIS

Post by cheerleader » 7 years ago

Thanks for posting, Dania...there is a cross-over of NMO and CCSVI, as researched by BNAC. BNAC included NMO in their MS category for CCSVI studies.
Here's a note I wrote up for Facebook today:
There was a recent program aired on Canadian TV regarding patients with NMO (neuromyelitis optica or Devic's Disease) being misdiagnosed with MS.

Here is the program:
Dangerous Diagnosis
http://www.globalnews.ca/16x9/video/dan ... ber5/video

NMO is a bit different than MS, in that it is specific to demyelination of the optic nerve and spinal cord, not brain tissue.
But it has been related to CCSVI- and was included in the MS category by Zivadinov at BNAC-

The highest prevalence of CCSVI was seen in relapsing primary-progressive MS (89.4 percent), followed by non-relapsing secondary-progressive MS (67.2 percent), NMO (66.6 percent), primary-progressive MS (54.5 percent) and relapsing-remitting MS (49.2 percent). CCSVI prevalence was substantially higher in progressive MS than in non-progressive MS patients. In addition, patients with a progressive MS disease subtype had higher CCSVI prevalence than those with non-progressive MS.

http://www.sciencenewsline.com/medicine ... 00020.html
https://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_ ... 0319137211

I hope that the Hubbard Foundaton will make contact with the NMO foundation in San Diego--and was working on making that connection this morning. Lots to learn!
cheer
Husband dx RRMS 3/07
dx dual jugular vein stenosis (CCSVI) 4/09
http://ccsviinms.blogspot.com

User avatar
Quest56
Family Elder
Posts: 316
Joined: 12 years ago
Location: Northern Calif Monterey Bay Area
Contact:

Re: MISDIAGNOSIS

Post by Quest56 » 7 years ago

Interesting video, I'm sure our hearts all go out to those with this disease, especially those mis-dignosed with MS who are placed on the wrong meds/treatments.

But, what does this have to do with CCSVI? I'm sorry if I missed the connection. Cheerleader connects NMO with CCSVI in her post, which makes sense in this topic.

It confuses me why so many people seem to make so little use of the other forums at thisIsMS.com? Not every post belongs in the CCSVI forum, and those who only watch the CCSVI forum are missing out.

(I'm also lucky enough to work with a neurologist who gave me a blood test to test for this condition early on, so that I can be fairly certain I have MS, not NMO.)

--Tracy
CCSVI Procedure 9/16/2009 at Stanford
Stent in left and right IJVs
SPMS
Copaxone
Former Ampyra User
Regular Botox Bladder Injections
300mg d-Biotin / day

User avatar
dania
Family Elder
Posts: 1088
Joined: 8 years ago
Location: St Lazare Quebec

Re: MISDIAGNOSIS

Post by dania » 7 years ago

I put it here as it made me think of all who have been given the label of MS and perhaps that is not what they have. I now wonder if MS is an actual disease? I am thinking it is more a condition of obstructed blood flow that causes neurological symptoms? If you look at a stroke victim, their symptoms are eerily similar to a lot of MS symptoms. And with what other DISEASE do you see such a wide range of symptoms differing between patients? For example I was diagnosed with MS 23 years ago. I have never had optic neuritis. Food for thought.

User avatar
jimmylegs
Volunteer Moderator
Posts: 11811
Joined: 13 years ago
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: MISDIAGNOSIS

Post by jimmylegs » 7 years ago

perhaps the 'general discussion' forum, seeing as we do not yet have an 'undiagnosed' area?
take control of your own health
pursue optimal self care at least as actively as a diagnosis
ask for referrals to preventive health care specialists eg dietitians
don't let suboptimal self care muddy any underlying diagnostic picture!

Post Reply