Hayes inspired Calcitriol+D3 2013-2014
Coimbra Protocol 2014-16
DrG B12 Transdermal Spray 2014-16
Low-Dose Immunotherapy 2015-16
My Current Regimen http://www.thisisms.com/forum/regimens-f22/topic25634.html
This is what I have been trying to say all along, there are so many crossovers, Lyme, lupas, hughes syndrome, misaligned atlas, Candida, chronic fatigue syndrome and i imagine others too, all of these have been misdiagnosed at some point.
Wow great info.
It is not so easy. In fact there is no consensus about what MS is. There is no formal definition of the condition, and according to the (awful) McDonald criteria you have MS if you have marks in you MRI that you cannot explain. Of course, other doctors use other definitions.PointsNorth wrote:Just a blood test to rule it in/out.
The problem is not a lack of a test. The problem is a lack of consensus about which condition(s) should be named MS. You can rule out MS with the blood test, but still you get no information from a NMO-negative test.
Anyway, any person ever diagnosed with MS should have a blood test for NMO. And again MS associations are doing nothing to fix this problem.
- Family Elder
- Posts: 5359
- Joined: 11 years ago
- Location: southern California
- Been thanked: 1 time
Here's a note I wrote up for Facebook today:
https://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_ ... 0319137211There was a recent program aired on Canadian TV regarding patients with NMO (neuromyelitis optica or Devic's Disease) being misdiagnosed with MS.
Here is the program:
http://www.globalnews.ca/16x9/video/dan ... ber5/video
NMO is a bit different than MS, in that it is specific to demyelination of the optic nerve and spinal cord, not brain tissue.
But it has been related to CCSVI- and was included in the MS category by Zivadinov at BNAC-
The highest prevalence of CCSVI was seen in relapsing primary-progressive MS (89.4 percent), followed by non-relapsing secondary-progressive MS (67.2 percent), NMO (66.6 percent), primary-progressive MS (54.5 percent) and relapsing-remitting MS (49.2 percent). CCSVI prevalence was substantially higher in progressive MS than in non-progressive MS patients. In addition, patients with a progressive MS disease subtype had higher CCSVI prevalence than those with non-progressive MS.
http://www.sciencenewsline.com/medicine ... 00020.html
I hope that the Hubbard Foundaton will make contact with the NMO foundation in San Diego--and was working on making that connection this morning. Lots to learn!
dx dual jugular vein stenosis (CCSVI) 4/09
- Family Elder
- Posts: 316
- Joined: 12 years ago
- Location: Northern Calif Monterey Bay Area
Interesting video, I'm sure our hearts all go out to those with this disease, especially those mis-dignosed with MS who are placed on the wrong meds/treatments.
But, what does this have to do with CCSVI? I'm sorry if I missed the connection. Cheerleader connects NMO with CCSVI in her post, which makes sense in this topic.
It confuses me why so many people seem to make so little use of the other forums at thisIsMS.com? Not every post belongs in the CCSVI forum, and those who only watch the CCSVI forum are missing out.
(I'm also lucky enough to work with a neurologist who gave me a blood test to test for this condition early on, so that I can be fairly certain I have MS, not NMO.)
Stent in left and right IJVs
Former Ampyra User
Regular Botox Bladder Injections
300mg d-Biotin / day
pursue optimal self care at least as actively as a diagnosis
ask for referrals to preventive health care specialists eg dietitians
don't let suboptimal self care muddy any underlying diagnostic picture!