Non-processed Red Meat

If it's on your mind and it has to do with multiple sclerosis in any way, post it here.
Post Reply
User avatar
Petr75
Family Elder
Posts: 285
Joined: Sat Oct 19, 2013 10:17 am
Location: Czech Republic
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 3 times

Non-processed Red Meat

Post by Petr75 » Wed Apr 10, 2019 2:36 am

2019 Feb 19
School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
Higher Non-processed Red Meat Consumption Is Associated With a Reduced Risk of Central Nervous System Demyelination.
PMC https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6389668/

Abstract
The evidence associating red meat consumption and risk of multiple sclerosis is inconclusive. We tested associations between red meat consumption and risk of a first clinical diagnosis of central nervous system demyelination (FCD), often presaging a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. We used food frequency questionnaire data from the 2003-2006 Ausimmune Study, an incident, matched, case-control study examining environmental risk factors for FCD. We calculated non-processed and processed red meat density (g/1,000 kcal/day). Conditional logistic regression models (with participants matched on age, sex, and study region) were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) and p-values for associations between non-processed (n = 689, 250 cases, 439 controls) and processed (n = 683, 248 cases, 435 controls) red meat density and risk of FCD. Models were adjusted for history of infectious mononucleosis, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations, smoking, race, education, body mass index and dietary misreporting. A one standard deviation increase in non-processed red meat density (22 g/1,000 kcal/day) was associated with a 19% reduced risk of FCD (AOR = 0.81; 95%CI 0.68, 0.97; p = 0.02). When stratified by sex, higher non-processed red meat density (per 22 g/1,000 kcal/day) was associated with a 26% reduced risk of FCD in females (n = 519; AOR = 0.74; 95%CI 0.60, 0.92; p = 0.01). There was no statistically significant association between non-processed red meat density and risk of FCD in males (n = 170). We found no statistically significant association between processed red meat density and risk of FCD. Further investigation is warranted to understand the important components of a diet that includes non-processed red meat for lower FCD risk.

ElliotB
Family Elder
Posts: 1815
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2014 4:08 pm
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 12 times

Re: Non-processed Red Meat

Post by ElliotB » Wed Apr 10, 2019 5:51 am

A very important element of this study is that is was completed in Australia where the majority of meats consumed were likely from grass fed animals because the majority of meats in Australia are grass fed so if a similar study was completed in an area where grain fed meats are the 'norm' which is most of the world and what is consumed by the participants, the results would likely be different. It is a fact that there is a HUGE difference in the nutritional elements of grass fed vs grain fed meats.

Post Reply