'The internet racing ahead of the scientific evidence' paper

A forum to discuss Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency and its relationship to Multiple Sclerosis.
Cece
Family Elder
Posts: 9332
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 3:00 pm
Contact:

'The internet racing ahead of the scientific evidence' paper

Post by Cece » Tue Jul 26, 2011 12:38 pm

http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S00 ... ci_arttext
The internet access

The Google search for "CCSVI multiple sclerosis" yielded over 650,000 results. The top result was a link to a clinic offering CCSVI evaluation services and MS liberation therapy (www.ccsvi-online.com), followed by the CCSVI Foundation (www.ccsvifoundation.org), which on its front page, reported on a patient who was denied the "liberation" treatment and filed a human rights complaint. Other links on the initial Google page led to pages explaining that there was a plot among neurologists to avoid referring patients to vascular surgeons because neurologists refused to believe in CCSVI (www.multiplesclerosissurgery.com). In addition, links to www.youtube.com presented over 700 videos of successful "liberation" treatment. The search on Yahoo! yielded over 80,000 results, including www.ccsvi-multiple-sclerosis.com, in which doctors willing to perform the liberation treatment could be located around the world, and www.ccsvi-for-ms.org, which advertised using the slogan "Liberation from Multiple Sclerosis - Free yourself".

Both Google and Yahoo! have several links accessing Facebook. The social network www.facebook.com contains dozens of discussion forums and social/charity events relating to CCSVI and MS. The largest CCSVI community on Facebook has nearly 30,000 participants. Although several participants are dubious about "liberation" treatment or have undergone it without success, the tone of the discussion is extremely optimistic.
TIMS is the birthplace of the CCSVI internet movement. Seriously, we've got creds. When I google "CCSVI multiple sclerosis," we pop up on the first page. I would've liked a mention!
During the European Congress of Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS) in October 2010, in Gothenburg, Sweden, Zamboni explained that the term "liberation" originated from a radiologist talking about blood vessels with insufficient blood flow. The talk of "blood flow liberation in the vessel" mutated into "liberation treatment for MS" in very little time.
And that is where the term 'liberation' came from...but it's a media term, particularly in Canada. We are not responsible for that term. We are, however, responsible for the term, "Liberati," which remains very catchy. ;)

PointsNorth
Family Elder
Posts: 683
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 2:00 pm
Location: LeftCoast Canada
Contact:

Post by PointsNorth » Wed Jul 27, 2011 8:30 am

Without the wicked internet, we'd be in for another 150-year wait c/w finger2nose + DMDs. It's not science that is under seige but rather neuros. And they clearly don't like it. :o
Albany 2010. Brooklyn 2011
Hayes inspired Calcitriol+D3 2013-2014
Coimbra Protocol 2014-16
DrG B12 Transdermal Spray 2014-16
Progesterone 2015-16
Low-Dose Immunotherapy 2015-16
My Current Regimen http://www.thisisms.com/forum/regimens-f22/topic25634.html

Lyon
Family Elder
Posts: 6061
Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 2:00 pm
Contact:

.

Post by Lyon » Wed Jul 27, 2011 8:56 am

.
Last edited by Lyon on Sun Nov 20, 2011 3:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Cece
Family Elder
Posts: 9332
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 3:00 pm
Contact:

Post by Cece » Wed Jul 27, 2011 9:04 am

PointsNorth, I agree. It's thanks to the internet that I had the procedure done, and thanks to the procedure being done that I feel better. Small miracles....

Lyon, when I mentioned creds, it was in respect to TIMS being the origin of the internet social media phenomenon of CCSVI. You were here then, I wasn't! I brought up the google search because that was the method used by the author of the article.

Dr. Siskin also had an abstract about social media and CCSVI. TIMS got mentioned by name in that one: http://tinyurl.com/3o5g3lt

User avatar
zinamaria
Family Elder
Posts: 296
Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 3:00 pm

Post by zinamaria » Wed Jul 27, 2011 11:24 am

Zamboni told me it was Dr. Fabrizio Salvi who used the term 'liberation' for free blood flow, hence he called it that. Hmmm

User avatar
cheerleader
Family Elder
Posts: 5360
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 2:00 pm
Location: southern California

Post by cheerleader » Wed Jul 27, 2011 12:06 pm

it really doesn't matter who gets credit...since this paper, like others on the social media influence in medicine (w/the exception of Siskin's), is trying to downplay the science by highlighting you tube videos and medical tourism sites. It's just as well TIMS didn't get a mention in that company :)

The truth of the matter is that it is the researchers--Dake, Haacke, Zamboni, Zivadinov, Siskin, Mehta, Sclafani, Hubbard, et al--who are keeping CCSVI in front of their colleagues by speaking on their research at international vascular and endovascular conferences and publishing in medical journals. CCSVI would not be a blip on google if it weren't for their work. "Cause Jeff couldn't have fixed his jugular veins himself....
cheer
Husband dx RRMS 3/07
dx dual jugular vein stenosis (CCSVI) 4/09
http://ccsviinms.blogspot.com

Lyon
Family Elder
Posts: 6061
Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 2:00 pm
Contact:

Post by Lyon » Wed Jul 27, 2011 12:52 pm

.
Last edited by Lyon on Sun Nov 20, 2011 3:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
civickiller
Family Elder
Posts: 558
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 3:00 pm
Location: Hawaii

Post by civickiller » Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:14 pm

if we want tims to be on the forefront, we need to push upper cervical care treatment pre and post diagnoses, imo

User avatar
fiddler
Family Elder
Posts: 398
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 3:00 pm
Location: Fredericton, Canada
Contact:

Cochrane review

Post by fiddler » Wed Jul 27, 2011 4:01 pm

Folks, I have been asked to help in a Cochrane review of CCSVI research to date. Cochrane reviews are well respected and provide an opportunity to steer the medical community toward adopting new techniques quicker, if warranted, and to identify gaps in current research. I would like our CCSVI community to help by producing a bibliography of relevant research literature concerning CCSVI and its treatment. The people I'm working with probably have most of the important references we might supply, but this way we reduce the risks of gaps. Joan and Marie will help a lot, I hope, but I'm sure that there are others who can help, as well. Please send me a message and I'll e-mail you the draft objectives and initial bibliography. Info about Cochrane reviews can be found at http://www.Cochrane.org.
...Ted
Dx SPMS in 2004.  Liberated 29/04/2010.
My blog: www.my-darn-ms.blogspot.com

User avatar
cheerleader
Family Elder
Posts: 5360
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 2:00 pm
Location: southern California

Re: Cochrane review

Post by cheerleader » Wed Jul 27, 2011 6:22 pm

fiddler wrote:Folks, I have been asked to help in a Cochrane review of CCSVI research to date. Cochrane reviews are well respected and provide an opportunity to steer the medical community toward adopting new techniques quicker, if warranted, and to identify gaps in current research. I would like our CCSVI community to help by producing a bibliography of relevant research literature concerning CCSVI and its treatment. The people I'm working with probably have most of the important references we might supply, but this way we reduce the risks of gaps. Joan and Marie will help a lot, I hope, but I'm sure that there are others who can help, as well. Please send me a message and I'll e-mail you the draft objectives and initial bibliography. Info about Cochrane reviews can be found at http://www.Cochrane.org.
...Ted
Great news, Ted. Love the Cochrane Reviews-- Thanks for taking this on. Preliminary research info can be found at CCSVI Alliance (we need to update our site, but most of the research is there:
link to research
I'll PM my e-mail, so you can send the info along. Will be wonderful to have a representation of all the research, neurological and vascular...but it won't be an easy job to compile :)
cheer
Husband dx RRMS 3/07
dx dual jugular vein stenosis (CCSVI) 4/09
http://ccsviinms.blogspot.com

Lyon
Family Elder
Posts: 6061
Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 2:00 pm
Contact:

Post by Lyon » Wed Jul 27, 2011 6:56 pm

.
Last edited by Lyon on Sun Nov 20, 2011 3:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Cece
Family Elder
Posts: 9332
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 3:00 pm
Contact:

Post by Cece » Wed Jul 27, 2011 8:05 pm

Here is recently published research that found CCSVI by both catheter venogram and MRV: http://tinyurl.com/66vc33c

Lyon, it does go both ways, I look forward to clarity on these issues (mainly the association between CCSVI and MS and the usefulness of the CCSVI venoplasty procedure.)

User avatar
ikulo
Family Elder
Posts: 444
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 2:00 pm
Location: colorado

Post by ikulo » Wed Jul 27, 2011 8:16 pm

Lyon wrote:The article opening this thread, as do most other recent articles, except those written by Zamboni, puts into question the very existence of ccsvi.
I don't agree, but even if it were true, at least we're stirring the pot. 150 years of MS research and we have very little to show for it. Finally someone (ie everyone involved in this research) has the cajones to challenge the status quo. That's what innovation is all about.

User avatar
civickiller
Family Elder
Posts: 558
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 3:00 pm
Location: Hawaii

Post by civickiller » Thu Jul 28, 2011 1:44 am

http://uprightdoctor.wordpress.com/
http://www.upright-health.com/index.html

checkout this site and read through the entire site. if you look at it with an open mind as you did with ccsvi youll find alot of gaps and explanations filled.

maybe if we can get other dr's to read this with an open mind too, we can get ccsvi working for everybody for good no resurgery every year.

with ccsvi being so new, why are people dismissing upper cervical care :roll:

User avatar
1eye
Family Elder
Posts: 3770
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 3:00 pm
Location: Kanata, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Post by 1eye » Thu Jul 28, 2011 4:27 am

ikulo wrote:
Lyon wrote:The article opening this thread, as do most other recent articles, except those written by Zamboni, puts into question the very existence of ccsvi.
I don't agree, but even if it were true, at least we're stirring the pot. 150 years of MS research and we have very little to show for it. Finally someone (ie everyone involved in this research) has the cajones to challenge the status quo. That's what innovation is all about.
While they might just be fronts for the nay-sayers, I think the Cochrane review is highly regarded, and it is unlikely that they would be interested in meta-analysis of things anyone seriously thinks don't exist. I suppose anything is possible but I doubt it. The fact that Neurology is still willing to fan those embers shows what terrible damage has been done in the name of Science, by people who should know better, IMO.
This unit of entertainment not brought to you by FREMULON.
Not a doctor.

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency (CCSVI)”