I do not know. They published only the short abstract and it doesn't say anything about blinded or not blinded.Rokkit wrote:Erika, was this study blinded?
Erika
I do not know. They published only the short abstract and it doesn't say anything about blinded or not blinded.Rokkit wrote:Erika, was this study blinded?
Thanks for posting the abstract of this study. Here is a Google translation...ErikaSlovakia wrote:This study was done in Slovakia. They had 40 MS patients and 40 healthy controls. They used ultrasound (no MR, no venography).
They found 9 healthy controls with reflux and 34 MS patients with reflux.
Conclusion: Venous reflux is significantly higher in patients with MS than in healthy controls.
They made it public here: 24. Czech and Slovak neurological conference in Hradec Kralove (Czech republic) 24.-27. Nov. 2010.
I wonder if articles like this are merely social engineering, and the real statement is to the police: if you hear of corruption under say, 500K that is really just business as usual for us, so don't worry about it at that level, ok?ErikaSlovakia wrote:No comment.
http://tinyurl.com/4um9gob
Google translation:dobrý večer
U všech pacientů je provedeno nejprve neinvazivní vyšetření ultrazvukem a magnetickou rezonancí, do studie vstupují až po potvrzení zůžení na krčních žilách po podrobném vysvětlení nálezu. U malé skupiny pacientů se zůžení nenajde.. tito cca 5-10% nejsou do studie zařazeni. Efektivita angioplastiky je cca u 60% pacientů, po 3 měsících sledování statisticky nesignifikantně lepší pro intervenovanou skupinu ve 3 hodnotících škálách FSS,MFIS,MSIS-29.(Placebo??) Je však potřeba vyčkat ročních výsledků sledování a hlavně analýz kontrolních MR vyšetření.
s pozdravem
v procházka
He posted this text last night on the Czech MS Forumgood evening
In all patients, performed first noninvasive ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging, to enter the study after confirmation of the narrowing of the cervical veins after a detailed explanation of the finding. In a small group of patients no narrowing found .. approximately 5-10% of these are not enrolled. The effectiveness of angioplasty is about 60% of patients after 3 months of follow statistically insignificantly better for the group intervened in the 3 assessment scales FSS, Mfise, MSIs-29. (Placebo?) However, it is necessary to await the results of annual monitoring and analysis of control especially MRI.
regards
Dr. Prochazka