Count me in!Sharon wrote:
I think we should all send it to the NMSS - flood their email box. Any volunteers?
Sharon
cheer
Count me in!Sharon wrote:
I think we should all send it to the NMSS - flood their email box. Any volunteers?
Sharon
So it may be that it only goes to the referee this month. In most fields it can take anywhere from 1-3 months from that point until publication...Arcee wrote:Radeck, totally get that the date really matters. It is not listed in the current October table of contents. Does anyone know how to confirm?
You are probably talking about Ashton Embry.A well known MS writer - who's name eludes me at the moment- wrote a very positive narrative on CCSVI , and he HAD NOT heard of it until recently.
What is not stated is the NMSS is in financial distress - they may have an interest but they have no money.Read the NMSS article again ....they clearly state their interest in funding new MS research.
No, it does not sound dismissive -At the present time ,we have not been approached for funding any projects related to CCSVI. If we receive a proposal related to CCSVI that is found to be outstanding and relevant to MS , we would likely commit to fund such a study.
Does that sound dismissive ?
I do not doubt the NMSS wants to fund new MS research - they have in the past, they are currently, and they will do so in the future. My understanding is that at this point in time, due to the economy, the NMSS like other organizations, is not as financially strong as it used to be.What is not stated is the NMSS is in financial distress - they may have an interest but they have no money.