Wanted to tuck this in here instead of creating a new topic. 
It's a paper comparing different imaging techniques 
for MRI/MRA/MRV's, specifically in children. 
I wonder if any of these dear ones are heading 
for MS later in life due to the stenoses, and 
underdevelopment of the veins that were found. 
Too bad there's no way to track them. 
http://radiology.rsna.org/content/235/3/1011.full
Mark
Cerebral MR Venography in Children: 
Comparison of 2D Time-of-Flight and 
Gadolinium-enhanced 3D Gradient-Echo Techniques1
Figure 8. Oblique shaded surface rendering from 3D MR 
venography data set in 3-year-old boy shows 
right dominant transverse sinus and a 
stenosis of the sigmoid sinus (arrow);
 the stenosis was not apparent at
 2D MR venography. 
DISCUSSIONThe larger venous structures draining the brain 
may be studied noninvasively at MR imaging by using 
phase-contrast techniques, time-of-flight techniques, 
and contrast material–enhanced 3D sequences (1–7).
 Phase-contrast MR angiography is limited by 
gradient imperfections, eddy currents, and long acquisition times
 and potential lack of sensitivity to slow flow if the 
selected velocity encoding is incorrect (2,6). 
Two-dimensional time-of-flight MR venography suffers
 from progressive signal loss caused by slow-flowing protons 
and by the flow of protons parallel to rather than 
perpendicular to the imaging plane; both of these 
phenomena result in spin saturation (3). 
Gadolinium chelate reduces the spin saturation and 
is best administered as a bolus to avoid enhancement 
of chronically thrombosed venous structures;
 
enhancement of such structures may simulate
 the appearance of a patent venous sinus (6). 
Techniques for bolus injection of gadolinium chelate with 
subsequent acquisition of images with a 3D rapid 
gradient-echo sequence have been described 
previously for the imaging of intracranial venous 
anatomy in adults (5,6).
This is meant in the vein (no pun intended) of 
"just because they say it's not there, does not mean it's not there". 
Imaging is an imperfect picture, results are open to interpretation.
 Properly conducted ultrasound showing reflux will hopefully, someday,
 become the gold standard for screening. 
Mark