does this seem right?
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 11:54 am
Sorry to go on about myself here. But does all this sound right to you?
I had optic neuritis (right eye), about nine years ago. It didn't resolve. Ten months later, ON again in both eyes. Left me visually impaired with very little resolution. (see halos at night as I described here, color loss, central vision field loss, kind of like looking through a smoky/dirty room). A few months later, small episode again in my left eye. Went on Tysabri. Small episode yet again a year or so later. Haven't been able to drive or work since all this started. No other MS progression or "typical" symptoms.
I don't have fatigue. I am not heat intolerant. While I have some brain fog and some numbness/tingling that comes and goes in hands and feet, I have no limitations in walking, balance, or any other neurological deficits. Other than vision, I feel basically normal.
Lumbar Puncture is normal. No lesions on spine. Only two or three lesions on brain "suggestive of MS" but that have not changed, even three years after stopping medication.
So I just went to the ER with yet another flair of vision problems (quick loss of vision, color, after several months of seeing halos and glare at night). They found no evidence of ON on the MRI. They found no progress in my brain MRI. No elevated blood inflammatory markers.
This all seems weird (atypical) to me. Yet here's what happens diagnosis wise. I went to the local hospital way back in the beginning. They sent me to the University Hospital in my state for a MS clinic because basically I think the Neuro wasn't quite sure if it was MS. The doctors at the clinic treated it like a patient transfer and just assumed MS because the local doctor thought MS. Then the radiologist report says the findings are "consistent with clinical picture of MS". But I don't have a clinical picture of MS. They base the diagnosis on the radiologist reports. I feel like everyone is just assuming everyone else knows what they are talking about.
Statistically if you have ON, you have about a 20 percent chance it will reoccur. I've had 5 episodes of ON with little or nothing else to say MS. My recovery has been unusually bad. The big thing that gets me is the halos. I can find no one else here who also has that experience. Should I be looking for something else besides MS after all these years? Something in addition? It seems the docs are all just an echo chamber where everyone assumes everyone else knows something more than they actually do.
I had optic neuritis (right eye), about nine years ago. It didn't resolve. Ten months later, ON again in both eyes. Left me visually impaired with very little resolution. (see halos at night as I described here, color loss, central vision field loss, kind of like looking through a smoky/dirty room). A few months later, small episode again in my left eye. Went on Tysabri. Small episode yet again a year or so later. Haven't been able to drive or work since all this started. No other MS progression or "typical" symptoms.
I don't have fatigue. I am not heat intolerant. While I have some brain fog and some numbness/tingling that comes and goes in hands and feet, I have no limitations in walking, balance, or any other neurological deficits. Other than vision, I feel basically normal.
Lumbar Puncture is normal. No lesions on spine. Only two or three lesions on brain "suggestive of MS" but that have not changed, even three years after stopping medication.
So I just went to the ER with yet another flair of vision problems (quick loss of vision, color, after several months of seeing halos and glare at night). They found no evidence of ON on the MRI. They found no progress in my brain MRI. No elevated blood inflammatory markers.
This all seems weird (atypical) to me. Yet here's what happens diagnosis wise. I went to the local hospital way back in the beginning. They sent me to the University Hospital in my state for a MS clinic because basically I think the Neuro wasn't quite sure if it was MS. The doctors at the clinic treated it like a patient transfer and just assumed MS because the local doctor thought MS. Then the radiologist report says the findings are "consistent with clinical picture of MS". But I don't have a clinical picture of MS. They base the diagnosis on the radiologist reports. I feel like everyone is just assuming everyone else knows what they are talking about.
Statistically if you have ON, you have about a 20 percent chance it will reoccur. I've had 5 episodes of ON with little or nothing else to say MS. My recovery has been unusually bad. The big thing that gets me is the halos. I can find no one else here who also has that experience. Should I be looking for something else besides MS after all these years? Something in addition? It seems the docs are all just an echo chamber where everyone assumes everyone else knows something more than they actually do.