This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Knowledge & Support Community
Welcome to This is MS, the leading forum for Multiple Sclerosis research and support. Join our friendly community of patients, caregivers, and researchers celebrating over 20 years of delivering hope through knowledge.
jimmylegs wrote:hi guys can you shrink those images a bit to maintain the right page width? very interesting viewing thx leetz
Define "right page width". No scrolling on my monitor (17").
Mark.
RRMS Dx'd 2007, first episode 2004. Bilateral stent placement, 3 on left, 1 stent on right, at Stanford August 2009. Watch my operation video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwc6QlLVtko, Virtually symptom free since, no relap
jimmylegs wrote:hi guys can you shrink those images a bit to maintain the right page width? very interesting viewing thx leetz
Define "right page width". No scrolling on my monitor (17").
Mark.
On a 15" monitor with the resolution set to 800 x 600, a maximum image size of about 750 pixels wide is ok. This will cause the page to scroll horizontally somewhat, but the main column for the forum will still fit on the screen just fine.
jimmylegs wrote:hi guys can you shrink those images a bit to maintain the right page width? very interesting viewing thx leetz
Define "right page width". No scrolling on my monitor (17").
Mark.
On a 15" monitor with the resolution set to 800 x 600, a maximum image size of about 750 pixels wide is ok. This will cause the page to scroll horizontally somewhat, but the main column for the forum will still fit on the screen just fine.
NHE
Yeah, it's hard to tell what others are seeing, one man's "good" is bad for everyone else and vice versa. I have a 17" 1280x1024 so can read it from 10 feet away lol. Okay so I tried the teensy sizes at Small, the one I posted was medium (that's why the URL for it is "websize", and large is definitely out of the question, so what to do? The websize one (medium) is 638x640, seems small enough to me. If I post and have to scroll width-wise, then yeah it's too much but it just bumps out the center of the forum posting maybe 1/2". I think maybe some have the res for their monitors set really low to "blow things up" now everything on the net has to shrink down to fit the width.
Ouch my brain!
RRMS Dx'd 2007, first episode 2004. Bilateral stent placement, 3 on left, 1 stent on right, at Stanford August 2009. Watch my operation video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwc6QlLVtko, Virtually symptom free since, no relap
it all fits fine on my screen. i was going by whether it bumped out past the header, because this seemed to me to be the point of shortening urls. i'm new at moderating, if the width doesn't really matter then i learned something, please have patience with my learning curve - from time to time something like this is just gonna happen
leetz wrote:SUrPRISE SUrPRISE...WE HAVE STENOSIS...WOW...2ND OPINION FROM SOMEONE WHO KNOW THEIR SH#$...
okay--my fellow radiologist lol...you were all correct!!!!!left jugular is wwwwwwaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyy to narrow...will keep you updated!!!
I'm uh, giggling in a manly way. Around these parts, we CONGRATULATE people on identifiable physical deformities. You mean that paper thin thing that is your left jugular, might be too narrow? Do pray tell....
Kudos to everyone. Uh, those were just layperson's opinions. We aren't open for business... ;)
Can't wait to hear more.
Mark
RRMS Dx'd 2007, first episode 2004. Bilateral stent placement, 3 on left, 1 stent on right, at Stanford August 2009. Watch my operation video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwc6QlLVtko, Virtually symptom free since, no relap
YOU ARE TOO FUNNY!!!LOL... i know...crazy isn't it!!! ye have little faith in the specialist...to all of those that will/are being tested...PLEASE GO TO SOMEONE THAT SPECIALTY IS VEINS!!!NOT NERVES!!!
GOD BLESS.... CCSVI treatment Dr. Siskin great doc....symptom's improved for about 3 week's (gait, balance, spasticity) now back to square 1...
Way to go Leetz. Just curious , was their any mention of your right jugular? In discussing it here before we thought we may have noticed it to be twisted and flattened. I'm by no means an expert. Just curious what if anything was said about it. Good to see more people are taking notice of this!