Re: Long term symptoms but an answer maybe coming...
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 3:44 pm
recall there are close to 30 essential vitamins and minerals... lots of things that are vital to a baby's development and b12 doesn't have any supreme importance. nikki your interest in seeing a dietitian, getting an array of tests relevant for ms patients (and your baby too), and making some broad spectrum diet and hydration changes for your whole family is a VERY wise approach. if you're worried about your b12 status in spite of your good serum result, asking for serum holoTC won't do any harm 
for some perspective, here is a basic search of academic literature on nutrition and infant development
http://scholar.google.ca/scholar?hl=en& ... 5&as_sdtp=
780,000 links returned, with the first studies in the list examining fatty acids, iron, zinc, and mom's general nutrient status.
if we focus on B12 and infant development in particular, google scholar returns 9980 results and the research focuses on problems in outright b12 deficiency.
http://scholar.google.ca/scholar?q=coba ... _sdt=0%2C5
by comparison if we look at iron and infant development, google scholar returns 300,000 results
http://scholar.google.ca/scholar?q=iron ... _sdt=0%2C5
the first study is interesting: Iron-deficiency anemia and infant development: Effects of extended oral iron therapy
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar ... 7696700707
the author notes that oral iron therapy corrected the anemia but not the lower developmental scores. it's the problem of looking at nutrients in isolation - isolated iron therapy would impair zinc status, which is just as important for child development.
zinc and infant development results number in the upper 70,000s
http://scholar.google.ca/scholar?q=zinc ... _sdt=0%2C5
in this list of studies, iron and zinc are considered together, which is encouraging. for example:
Iron and zinc supplementation promote motor development and exploratory behavior among Bangladeshi infants
http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/80/4/903.short
in that study working on iron and zinc together resulted in positive outcomes.
i'm glad that your husband is also interested in nutrition. maybe he won't stress you out as much if you're both all 'natural-calm-ed out', and working together towards a positive goal for your family

for some perspective, here is a basic search of academic literature on nutrition and infant development
http://scholar.google.ca/scholar?hl=en& ... 5&as_sdtp=
780,000 links returned, with the first studies in the list examining fatty acids, iron, zinc, and mom's general nutrient status.
if we focus on B12 and infant development in particular, google scholar returns 9980 results and the research focuses on problems in outright b12 deficiency.
http://scholar.google.ca/scholar?q=coba ... _sdt=0%2C5
by comparison if we look at iron and infant development, google scholar returns 300,000 results
http://scholar.google.ca/scholar?q=iron ... _sdt=0%2C5
the first study is interesting: Iron-deficiency anemia and infant development: Effects of extended oral iron therapy
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar ... 7696700707
the author notes that oral iron therapy corrected the anemia but not the lower developmental scores. it's the problem of looking at nutrients in isolation - isolated iron therapy would impair zinc status, which is just as important for child development.
zinc and infant development results number in the upper 70,000s
http://scholar.google.ca/scholar?q=zinc ... _sdt=0%2C5
in this list of studies, iron and zinc are considered together, which is encouraging. for example:
Iron and zinc supplementation promote motor development and exploratory behavior among Bangladeshi infants
http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/80/4/903.short
in that study working on iron and zinc together resulted in positive outcomes.
i'm glad that your husband is also interested in nutrition. maybe he won't stress you out as much if you're both all 'natural-calm-ed out', and working together towards a positive goal for your family
