Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 5:20 pm
I am told drbart is quoting 'goodfellas' 
I have to brush up on my mafia movie references!

I have to brush up on my mafia movie references!
Welcome to This is MS, the leading forum for Multiple Sclerosis research and support. Join our friendly community of patients, caregivers, and researchers celebrating over 20 years of delivering hope through knowledge.
https://www.thisisms.com/forum/
Something that I have been thinking of as a "scarf", is a product called Farabloc (Google link with links to sales, NIH studies, etc.) - a product I bought for my old Grandma years ago. She swore by it, and would use it constantly for pain. I've been too lazy to unpack it from her stuff, but I have been curious of any possible effect on my own veins.vivavie wrote:If my stents are occluded what are my options, I am already on coumadin and plavix? I have a stent within stents within stents (3 layers), Is there anything more that can be done? should I even bother to get that US?
could it be something other than thrombosis? an infection leading to swelling?vivavie wrote:If my stents are occluded what are my options, I am already on coumadin and plavix? I have a stent within stents within stents (3 layers), Is there anything more that can be done? should I even bother to get that US?
Huh? Did I miss something? This thread goes so fast! Three layers of stents sounds a first. How did that happen and for what purpose?vivavie wrote:I have a stent within stents within stents (3 layers)
If there is a thrombus, then what can be done?drsclafani wrote:could it be something other than thrombosis? an infection leading to swelling?vivavie wrote:If my stents are occluded what are my options, I am already on coumadin and plavix? I have a stent within stents within stents (3 layers), Is there anything more that can be done? should I even bother to get that US?
i think a simple ultrasound is valuable in excluding thrombus too.
vivavie
i am so sorry you had the stent in the first place.
Mechanical clot removal? Thrombolysis?vivavie wrote:If there is a thrombus, then what can be done?
I could never feel the presence of the stents, for 10 days it is getting more sore.
A doctor in the makingCece wrote: Cece
not a doctor
firstly, we must ask what was the intention behind the first intervention. Was it to eliminate some painful symptoms? to reverse some weakness or sensory mprove balance? to reverse fatigue ?vivavie wrote:If my stents are occluded what are my options, I am already on coumadin and plavix? I have a stent within stents within stents (3 layers), Is there anything more that can be done? should I even bother to get that US?
Yes my IRN is at 2,4 - target is between 2 and3.Cece wrote:Mechanical clot removal? Thrombolysis?vivavie wrote:If there is a thrombus, then what can be done?
I could never feel the presence of the stents, for 10 days it is getting more sore.
Ballooning within the stent?
How have your coumadin INR levels been testing at? Some people have difficulty getting up to the right level.
Did you ever have testing to see how your dural sinuses look on that side?
Cece
not a doctor
i put in the third set of stents for intimal hyperplasia elicited by the first two stents. Sometimes more stents are required . but i want ti reiterate that the incidence should probably be very smallBrainteaser wrote:Huh? Did I miss something? This thread goes so fast! Three layers of stents sounds a first. How did that happen and for what purpose?vivavie wrote:I have a stent within stents within stents (3 layers)
Thank you Dr Sclafani, i will answer all your questions, have the US and get back to you for further disscussion.drsclafani wrote:firstly, we must ask what was the intention behind the first intervention. Was it to eliminate some painful symptoms? to reverse some weakness or sensory mprove balance? to reverse fatigue ?vivavie wrote:If my stents are occluded what are my options, I am already on coumadin and plavix? I have a stent within stents within stents (3 layers), Is there anything more that can be done? should I even bother to get that US?
the ask whether that accomplished that. that is the first piece of the puzzle.
Secondly, if you had reversal of fortunte and symptoms returned, then was the original improvement of great value or a minor disappointing improvement.
Thirdly, what was the purpose of putting the first stent in? was it a regretful treatment plan or did it provide you with some worthwhile improvement
Fourthly, we know what the purpose of putting the last stents in. Did it provide what you were looking for.
After answering these questions, we can have a meaningful discussion of how much further to pursue this. Only you can answer these questions.
But, you are in pain, we do not know why. treatment, no treatment, i think it is important to understand what is going on because we cannot have a logical discussion with out knowing that.
drs
Hi Dr. Sclafani,davmets2 wrote:Dr Sclafani,
I just had my 3 month ultrasound. My procedure was done in 2 stages, one week apart. While doing the second procedure for the RJV the venogram showed that the LJV that was done the week before with 18 mm balloon had restenosed and clotted. He attempted to re-balloon without any success. Had been on warifin since then (just stopped taking yesterday).
The ultrasound that I just had done yesterday showed flow in both jugulars. He couldn't tell me how much flow. He suggested another procedure with ballooning and probably a stent, but gave no guarantees that this would work or help. He told me to think about it, but the sooner I do it the better chances of success.
I guess my question would be, is there any test to show how much flow I'm getting and do you think that I should consider another procedure, possibly with a different Dr. such as yourself.
Thanks