Welcome to This is MS, the leading forum for Multiple Sclerosis research and support. Join our friendly community of patients, caregivers, and researchers celebrating over 20 years of delivering hope through knowledge.
https://www.thisisms.com/forum/
So you do admit that even though there's not enough scientifically rigorous evidence there is at least some compelling evidence? Otherwise your position here would be unreasonable. Or would you also be "drinking grape koolaid under the light of the full moon while hopping on one foot" while waiting on the list?Lyon wrote:In fact several times I've admitted that if my wife's MS were more progressive we'd be on the waiting list.
It's clear from your willingness to get on a list that you know there is a lot more compelling evidence supporting CCSVI than hopping on one foot drinking kool-aid, but for some reason you try to equate the two in your arguments. You portray the CCSVI evidence as having no merit, yet your willingness to get on a list demonstrates you don't actually think that. You can't say it's just a matter of being willing to try anything, because there are significant risks associated with treatment (just ask any neurologist). You wouldn't accept those risks if you didn't think there was something to it. Welcome to where a lot of us have been for quite some time.Lyon wrote:Seriously CCSVI has it all over bee stings, snake venom and Mangosteen juice in the "seems sensible" department but what you and I are bantering about regards our disagreement on what constitutes compelling evidence.
I like all that, for the most part. To which I reply: fair enough.Lyon wrote:I was overly flippant with the "willing to try anything" statement. What you mention is a hard situation to comment on because "little" things can make so much difference. "IF" the future shows real health benefits to venous angioplasty, that seems woth accepting "considerable" risks.
As things stand, although there may be risks to venous angioplasty we've yet to discover, I don't think the risks we are aware of are off putting enough that would steer us away from the "POSSIBLE" benefits if her MS became aggressive.
I haven't given up hope for CCSVI, but I'm not sure that's the same as my finding "compelling evidence". Again, it "seems sensible" that venous insufficiency would be damaging but we've first got to ascertain that the assumed "insufficiency" really is "insufficient" flow capable of damage and that venous restrictions aren't a fact of life that all humans share.
The average human venous system hasn't been mapped well enough and on a large enough scale for us to say with any confidence that chronic cerebrospinal venous stenosis is really anything out of the ordinary and unique to MS, or damaging.
I worry less about the vested interest, and more about the scientific issue, that if the only way to detect the stenoses is to use special techniques and special equipment and special protocol, what is really going on is "creating" an image that looks like a stenoses. Veins are pretty malable, and react to positioning in special ways.concerned wrote:It seems one can only detect venous abnormalities properly if one has Zamboni's machine and course, which obviously come at a price. It seems odd that he's offering these things for sale before his theory has been tested and proven.
It sounds like a lot of vested interest to me.
I don't think you have to worry - it looks like the Mylabvinco ultrasound machine was designed specifically for diagnosing CCSVI:fogdweller wrote:I worry less about the vested interest, and more about the scientific issue, that if the only way to detect the stenoses is to use special techniques and special equipment and special protocol, what is really going on is "creating" an image that looks like a stenoses.
And if you're unsure of the interpretation, it looks like the software will help you out:The cooperation have generated a specific Premium Echo Doppler MyLabVinco with unique characteristics and specificities to make the correct diagnosis of CCSVI.
CCSVI and VHISS (Venous Hemodynamic Insufficiency Severity Score) analysis, protocol and scoring system
"The King is naked!""The Emperor's New Clothes"
An Emperor who cares for nothing but his wardrobe hires two weavers who promise him the finest suit of clothes from a fabric invisible to anyone who is unfit for his position or "just hopelessly stupid". The Emperor cannot see the cloth himself, but pretends that he can for fear of appearing unfit for his position or stupid; his ministers do the same. When the swindlers report that the suit is finished, they dress him in mime and the Emperor then marches in procession before his subjects. A child in the crowd calls out that the Emperor is wearing nothing at all and the cry is taken up by others. The Emperor cringes, suspecting the assertion is true, but holds himself up proudly and continues the procession.
Hans Christian Andersen, 1837.
...Tx.1eye wrote:...Hey, where have you *been*? I had thought you weren't coming. The discussion's already very tired. Good luck.