VAC Pittsburgh
VAC Pittsburgh
anyone been treated at Vascular Access Center? i'm thinking about going to the located in Pittsburgh w/ Dr Robert Worthington-Kirsch.
Any input welcome
thanks.
Any input welcome
thanks.
Here is a pdf of a presentation Dr. Kirsch did this month on CCSVI at the VIA Foundation 3rd Annual Women’s Health Symposium in Buffalo, NY:
http://tinyurl.com/3zdws2m
Dr. Kirsch has been said to be using the "McGuckin Protocol" which we determined in another thread to mean checking not just the IJVs and azygous but also the renal veins and IVC. Dr. McGuckin has ballooned a number of patients renal veins, interpreting them as 50% blocked; Dr. Sclafani has only ballooned one patient's renal vein.
Ballooning unnecessarily could cause damage; not ballooning if it is a stenosis could leave it untreated. The azygous can drain into the renal in some anatomical variants so that is why a blockage there could affect CCSVI.
In the same google search that turned up this pdf, it turned up the ISET newsletter which mentioned this non-CCSVI research:
A Very Long Post, I know, and I hope someone comes along with actual experience with the doctor. But I found his presentation materials of interest and it shows he has an understanding of CCSVI.
http://tinyurl.com/3zdws2m
I hadn't heard the term spectrum disorder before but it fits.Spectrum Disorder
Multiple insults
Threshold effect
No one cause
–No one cure
Different people have different spectra
–Heterogenous response to treatments
Abnormalities can be seen in normals
Migraine
Non-invasive imaging not yet helpful? Does VAC do a pre-procedure ultrasound?Initial Evaluation
Confirm Dx of MS
History and Physical
–Include metrics of MS
EDSS
Fatigue
MSIS
Evidence of other vein disease (espM-T)
Non-invasive imaging not yet helpful
This too makes me wonder if they do pre-procedure imaging. I find pre-procedure imaging to be a good thing for comparison to post-procedure imaging but hard to say.Catheter Venogram
Gold standard for evaluation
Diagnosis and treatment at same sitting
Evaluate IJVs and Azygosvein
? IVC Confluence, Renals
Dr. Kirsch has been said to be using the "McGuckin Protocol" which we determined in another thread to mean checking not just the IJVs and azygous but also the renal veins and IVC. Dr. McGuckin has ballooned a number of patients renal veins, interpreting them as 50% blocked; Dr. Sclafani has only ballooned one patient's renal vein.
Ballooning unnecessarily could cause damage; not ballooning if it is a stenosis could leave it untreated. The azygous can drain into the renal in some anatomical variants so that is why a blockage there could affect CCSVI.
Helpful for knowing what techniques he may use. PTBA means balloon angioplasty. It sounds like Dr. Kirsch will use high pressure balloons sometimes and stents if ballooning does not work but is unsure of the use of cutting balloons. Here he uses the term 'bailout' which is also on Dr. Sclafani's symposium list-of-topics, I need to get a precise definition of that term!Intervention
Look at both anatomy and flow
–Delay, turbulence, collaterals
PTBA
–Sometimes need high pressure balloons
–? Utility of cutting balloons/valvulotomes
Stents
–Lesions resistant to PTBA
–Bailout
–Recurrence
He's familiar with the concept of extravascular or physiological narrowing. I can't tell from this if he would stent these or not. Dr. Sclafani has called narrowing from the carotid impression a leave-me-alone lesion.Extravascular Lesions
Impression from carotid bulb
Impression from bone spurs
Compromise by muscle slips/fibrous bands
–Often positional
? Stent
? Surgical release
This is the 1/3rds, 1/3rds, 1/3rds that Dr. Siskin often discusses. I would assume that if Dr. Kirsch is mentioning it, he is seeing these results as well in his patients at about these percentages. He goes on to say the 1/3 mild, 1/3 no improvement.About 1/3 of patients have MAJOR symptom improvement
–Often almost immediate
–Dysarthria
–Strength/Coordination
–Fatigue
–Brain Fog
In the same google search that turned up this pdf, it turned up the ISET newsletter which mentioned this non-CCSVI research:
I mention it because it shows that Dr. Kirsch and Dr. Siskin have worked together. Seeing Dr. Siskin's 'thirds' stated in Dr. Kirsch's presentation also shows a cross-fertilization of ideas between the two. This is a good thing as Dr. Siskin has a great deal of experience with CCSVI at this point.The results of a randomized
trial to study the performance of
two leading bland embolics have
demonstrated equivalent outcomes
between the two products
used.1 The trial, published on line
by the Journal of Cardiovascular and
Interventional Radiology (CVIR) in
December 2010, was led by Robert
Worthington-Kirsch from the
Peripheral Vascular Institute of
Philadelphia with colleagues Gary
Siskin and Paul Hegener from a
second center, Albany Medical
College, New York, and involved
46 women.
Dr. Cumming has been saying that durability is important and where we'd like to see advances. Dr. Kirsch raises two good questions about durability.Durability varies
–? Dependent on vessel treated
–? Recurrence of symptoms associated with recurrence of lesion
Reasonable goals.Goals
Sort signal from noise
–Real treatment effect vs Placebo effect
Candidate segmentation
–Who is or is not a candidate
–Timing of treatment
–Predictability of outcomes
Treatment protocols
–What is a lesion
–How to treat
A Very Long Post, I know, and I hope someone comes along with actual experience with the doctor. But I found his presentation materials of interest and it shows he has an understanding of CCSVI.
- codefellow
- Family Elder
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 3:00 pm
- Contact:
Cece wrote:Non-invasive imaging not yet helpful? Does VAC do a pre-procedure ultrasound?
I have been on the phone with a lady from VAC (they opened a center in New Orleans

- codefellow
- Family Elder
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 3:00 pm
- Contact:
codefellow wrote:Cece wrote:Non-invasive imaging not yet helpful? Does VAC do a pre-procedure ultrasound?
I have been on the phone with a lady from VAC (they opened a center in New Orleans). They do NOT do a pre-procedure ultrasound. Dr. McGuckin feels it doesn't show him enough useful data and is an unnecessary expense for the patient.
....or wait, maybe he doesn't do an MRV...is that the same thing?
Please ignore my previous post and this one. Clearly I do NOT know what
I am talking about...

I talked to the Vacular Access Center in Pittsburgh about four weeks ago to see if they use the Zamboni protocol ultrasound. Talked to office manager and he said they do not do Zamboni ultrasounds, nor do they do ultrasound before procedure. I had called hoping their center could be a possibility for follow-up ultrasounds for my husband.
He also mentioned that Dr. McGuckin is working with their Center. I too have read that Dr. McGuckin doesn't do a pre-procedure ultrasound. I should have asked if he uses IVUS.
He also mentioned that Dr. McGuckin is working with their Center. I too have read that Dr. McGuckin doesn't do a pre-procedure ultrasound. I should have asked if he uses IVUS.
Vascular Access Centers don't use Doppler because
It can be misleading. They use the venogram and catheter. Since 97% of MS patients have two or more veins blocked (Zamboni protocol for CCSVI) they keep the cost low by not adding additional testing.
There are two reasons for the pre-procedure ultrasound that I know of:
- to provide indication of CCSVI so insurance companies will cover further investigation/treatment
- to have a "before" ultrasound to which to compare any "after" ultrasounds
I'm not sure I have an opinion on whether to skip them or not.
- to provide indication of CCSVI so insurance companies will cover further investigation/treatment
- to have a "before" ultrasound to which to compare any "after" ultrasounds
I'm not sure I have an opinion on whether to skip them or not.