Requesting a subforum about biomarkers
Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2015 12:32 am
It seems that biomarkers research is growing, and, appart of their importance for diagnosis, they can shed light into the ultimate causes of MS.
No cure for MS will appear while we don't understand what it is.
Does anybody else think that we need a subforum about basic research and biomarkers? Or about research into the causes of MS?
Some information about biomarkers that I have just found:
http://brain.oxfordjournals.org/content ... 3.full.pdf
They give a very interesting classification for biomarkers:
- A type 0 biomarker is a marker of the natural history of a disease and correlates longitudinally with known clinical indices.
- A type I biomarker captures the effects of a therapeutic intervention in accordance with its mechanism of action.
- A surrogate endpoint is a biomarker that is intended to serve as a substitute for a clinically meaningful endpoint and is expected to predict the effect of a therapeutic intervention.
Research into type 0 biomarkers should be a priority, from my point of view.
NOTE: Edited for grammar.
No cure for MS will appear while we don't understand what it is.
Does anybody else think that we need a subforum about basic research and biomarkers? Or about research into the causes of MS?
Some information about biomarkers that I have just found:
http://brain.oxfordjournals.org/content ... 3.full.pdf
They give a very interesting classification for biomarkers:
- A type 0 biomarker is a marker of the natural history of a disease and correlates longitudinally with known clinical indices.
- A type I biomarker captures the effects of a therapeutic intervention in accordance with its mechanism of action.
- A surrogate endpoint is a biomarker that is intended to serve as a substitute for a clinically meaningful endpoint and is expected to predict the effect of a therapeutic intervention.
Research into type 0 biomarkers should be a priority, from my point of view.
NOTE: Edited for grammar.