 |
| Modules |  |
| Google |  |
|
These ads help pay for the upkeep of our site. They are automatically served by Google and are not affiliated with This is MS. | |
| Languages |  |
|
Select Interface Language:
| |
| Who's Online |  |
There are currently, 212 guest(s) and 9 member(s) that are online.
You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here | |
| Next Step |  |
| Donations |  |
|
To remain unbiased, This is MS does not accept corporate sponsorships. Therefore, we must rely on our users to help support us. Please donate to our upkeep if you have the means. Thank you! | |
|  |
 | Possible Method of Action for Copaxone Discovered |
Copaxone, manufactured by Teva Pharmaceuticals, has long been an alternative for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients that do not want to take any of the interferon-class of medications such as Avonex, Rebif or Betaseron. While its efficacy has been shown in numerous clinical trials, its mode of action has always been somewhat of a mystery.
A new study sheds some light on what Copaxone might actually be doing to accomplish its beneficial effect. While the particulars of the research go far beyond the complexity any of us will care to delve into, or perhaps even understand, the basic finding are as follows:
- Copaxone administration elevates a particular type of immune system cell
- These cells are of the CD8+ class, known as the killer T cells for their ability to destroy infected cells
- These killer cells, in the presence of Copaxone, regulate the immune system by killing another type of immune system cell known as CD4+
- CD4+ cells are usually considered "helper" cells in that they do not actually kill other cells but "help" the rest of the immune system in doing so by, among other things, activating and directing the killer cells
Why the killing of CD4+ cells by CD8+ cells turns out to be a good thing is not quite clear. The immune system is exceedingly complex and any number of theories could be presented, such as that the particular "helper" cells that are killed were the ones directing the attack on the central nervous system. However, what can be deduced is that Copaxone has some immune-system modulating effect that is generally beneficial to MS'ers, and a rising number of at least this particular type of killer cell is not detrimental to an MS'er (at least overall)-- otherwise, Copaxone would have likewise had a negative effect on patients. For so many years, the mantra has been that boosting an MS'ers immune system would be a bad idea... as research continues to unfold the puzzle that is MS, it is become clear that that is not entirely the case.
Click 'read more' for the full abstract
Advertisement
Full Abstract
J Immunol. 2006 Jun 1;176(11):7119-29.
Therapeutic Induction of Regulatory, Cytotoxic CD8+ T Cells in Multiple Sclerosis.
Tennakoon DK, Mehta RS, Ortega SB, Bhoj V, Racke MK, Karandikar NJ.
Department of Pathology.
In the setting of autoimmunity, one of the goals of successful therapeutic immune modulation is the induction of peripheral tolerance, a large part of which is mediated by regulatory/suppressor T cells. In this report, we demonstrate a novel immunomodulatory mechanism by an FDA-approved, exogenous peptide-based therapy that incites an HLA class I-restricted, cytotoxic suppressor CD8(+) T cell response. We have shown previously that treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) with glatiramer acetate (GA; Copaxone) induces differential up-regulation of GA-reactive CD8(+) T cell responses. We now show that these GA-induced CD8(+) T cells are regulatory/suppressor in nature. Untreated patients show overall deficit in CD8(+) T cell-mediated suppression, compared with healthy subjects. GA therapy significantly enhances this suppressive ability, which is mediated by cell contact-dependent mechanisms. CD8(+) T cells from GA-treated patients and healthy subjects, but not those from untreated patients with MS, exhibit potent, HLA class I-restricted, GA-specific cytotoxicity. We further show that these GA-induced cytotoxic CD8(+) T cells can directly kill CD4(+) T cells in a GA-specific manner. Killing is enhanced by preactivation of target CD4(+) T cells and may depend on presentation of GA through HLA-E. Thus, we demonstrate that GA therapy induces a suppressor/cytotoxic CD8(+) T cell response, which is capable of modulating in vivo immune responses during ongoing therapy. These studies not only explain several prior observations relating to the mechanism of this drug but also provide important insights into the natural immune interplay underlying this human immune-mediated disease.
PMID: 16709875 [PubMed - in process]
|
|
|
|
| |
| Login |  |
|
Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name. | |
| Related Links |  |
| Article Rating |  |
Average Score: 4.3 Votes: 10

| |
| Options |  |
|
Re: Possible Method of Action for Copaxone Discovered (Score: 1) by Degerlache on Tuesday, May 23 @ 11:15:37 EDT (User Info | Send a Message) | | Hey,
In a recent article (Epstein-Barr Virus might kick-start Ms) there were CD4 cells mentionned (interferon-gamma producing EBNA1 specific T cells). Can anyone confirm that CD4 in that article is the same as CD4(+) in this article ?
Regards,
Degerlache |
|
|
Re: Possible Method of Action for Copaxone Discovered (Score: 1) by bromley on Tuesday, May 23 @ 13:30:03 EDT (User Info | Send a Message) | | A recent article about Daclizumab reported that the likely mode of action was encouraging an increase in Killer T cells (T Reg cells). The more they increased the better the results for the patient. Now it is suggested that Copaxone's likely mode of action is similar. These Killer T cells attack viruses and bacteria, which suggests that they are involved in some way with this disease. Perhaps it is a lack of Killer T cells which allows the virus or bacteria to kick off and leads to the MS cascade! Not sure how genes then play a role? But it seems like we need a balanced immune system in relation to the CNS - everything under control. If something gets out of kilter, them the trouble begins. Over-simplistic I know but Killer T cells = good. I need more of them. |
|
|
| 
|