Alberta Health Services statement on CCSVI

A forum to discuss Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency and its relationship to Multiple Sclerosis.

Alberta Health Services statement on CCSVI

Postby happydance » Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:38 pm

User avatar
Family Member
Posts: 42
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 3:00 pm



Postby fiddler » Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:45 pm

Yes, another example of how the sloppy wording in the BNAC study press release encourages abuse.
Dx SPMS in 2004.  Liberated 29/04/2010.
My blog:
User avatar
Family Elder
Posts: 398
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 3:00 pm
Location: Fredericton, Canada

Postby nicko » Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:09 pm

In his second study, Dr. Zamboni performed venous angioplasty on MS patients with coexistent CCSVI (as defined in his first study). Although the percentage of patients who were symptom-free was reported to have increased after venous angioplasty, the actual annualized relapse rate for the entire group remained unchanged. These findings, which appear somewhat contradictory, are likely explained by a small number of people having more relapses after intervention and / or by differences in the period of observation before and after the procedure. Nonetheless, the relapse outcomes do not clearly support a clinical benefit of venous angioplasty.

His second study???? They are classifying the angioplasty as a second study? Also didn't I read in Zamboni's original study that the angioplasty failed 47% of the time? meaning re-occurrence of symptoms and relapses in those patients? they don't seem to mention that when the angioplasty was successful the disease did not progress.
User avatar
Family Member
Posts: 99
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 2:00 pm

Return to Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency (CCSVI)


  • Related topics
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Contact us | Terms of Service