
i retract my apology....somehow, not sure how i corrected things, but the picture is now visible
friday_fcfriday_fc wrote:Doctor, hello from me, my virgin post to you.
Please advise me, is it wrong to not be prescribed any blood thinning medication at all after having angioplasty? Reason I ask is 3 of my friends who had this procedure (ballooning only) have not been given or advised to take them as post care routine.
Should I be concerned if I, also, am not given a prescription after my upcoming procedure?
Many thanks in advance - not only for an answer to this question, but for all you do.
Made me blush.......its been a while (and he was Italian).....STOP IT Friday, *ahem* thanks for your answer - I will try to insist on a 3 week course of something afterwards. See how i go. winkdrsclafani wrote:friday_fcfriday_fc wrote:Doctor, hello from me, my virgin post to you.
Please advise me, is it wrong to not be prescribed any blood thinning medication at all after having angioplasty? Reason I ask is 3 of my friends who had this procedure (ballooning only) have not been given or advised to take them as post care routine.
Should I be concerned if I, also, am not given a prescription after my upcoming procedure?
Many thanks in advance - not only for an answer to this question, but for all you do.
I will be gentle.
time out. it is now time to be roughfriday_fc wrote:Made me blush.......its been a while (and he was Italian).....STOP IT Friday, *ahem* thanks for your answer - I will try to insist on a 3 week course of something afterwards. See how i go. winkdrsclafani wrote:friday_fcfriday_fc wrote:Doctor, hello from me, my virgin post to you.
Please advise me, is it wrong to not be prescribed any blood thinning medication at all after having angioplasty? Reason I ask is 3 of my friends who had this procedure (ballooning only) have not been given or advised to take them as post care routine.
Should I be concerned if I, also, am not given a prescription after my upcoming procedure?
Many thanks in advance - not only for an answer to this question, but for all you do.
I will be gentle.
Thans, all. The arm is where the infusion was located. I was wondering because I had a vein visably collapse in my upper arm not whee the infusion was located and I was wondering if the mitoxantorone in the bloodstream might have been damaging. It was probably just another thing that happens on the exciting road through older age.Nunzio wrote:drsclafani wrote:
It depends upon which veins are used to infuse the chemotherapy. If the port is placed into the jugular veins, it could worsen the outflow obstructions. If it were in the subclavian vein, it could also cause damage that vein and worsen CCSVI.Normally this is done through a normal IV in the arm which is removed after the infusion.Multiple Sclerosis: The recommended dosage of Mitoxantrone is 12 mg/m2 given as a short (approximately 5 to 15 minutes) intravenous infusion every 3 months.
Read more: http://www.drugs.com/pro/mitoxantrone.h ... z0snXImb6N
Also, I see that it is your first post, welcome!!drsclafani wrote:I worry that these valves are going to be a real bugger, incomplete treatments, recurrent obstructions. One gets the sense that something will be ultimately needed to fix the abnormal valve against the wall and stop it from restricting blood flow. perhaps stents are the answer, or some endovenous procedure that resects the valve, or some other technique beyond my imagination at the moment. Surgery on veins, i am told by my vascular surgical colleagues is not without failure.
This is all so new.
so my answer is rather philosophical.
You are all pioneers and are looking for answers at the front of the wave. It it were neurosurgery, i might say, wait awhile. But jugular venoplasty and valvuloplasty is not particularly dangerous. So i think the decision is about how far out into the frontier you want to travel. Me? I would venture forth and look for a solution to some future recurrence or complication when i see it
drsclafani wrote:The valves are leaflets of tissue that are attached to the wall and close periodically by coming together. in ccsvi Some of the valves are thickened mounds of tissue that do not open and close at all, some just do not open all the way, some do not close all the way, some seem to have the leaflets fused partially or completely. , some form pockets adjacent to the lumen and balloon up some times. In all situations they restrict the flow of blood coming out of the neck and brain.Could ballooning solve valve problems?
Angioplasty attempts to tear the valve's attachment to the wall or split apart any fusion of the leaflets, or stretch wall adjacent to it. So it is not one question, one problem, or one solution. I do see improved flow, but we will have to wait to understand the natural history of the treatments.
We have a long way to go to understand these problems and determine the best way of treating the various problems. Bottom line, stay tuned. and keep asking the good questions.
Does that help you?
drsclafani wrote:First I would be an interventional radiologist, because that would give me the most experience to prepare me for this work.North52 wrote:Dr. Sclafani,
If I was an interventional radiologist without any experience in CCSVI,interested to start performing balloon angioplasty, what would be the most important pieces of advice you would give me?
What would be typical mistakes and perhaps harmful mistakes I could make and how can I best avoid making them?
Thanks,
North
then i would read everything i could about this entity because the technical side is not the most difficult. it is getting into a zen with the disease. understanding what problems the veins could have
then i would determine for myself whether this made sense and whether i would be good at this and would be doing good for the patient because PRIMUM NON NOCERE......or first do no harm
then i would find a neurology partner because someone has to prove the diagnosis, and treat the patient's MS
then i would read some more, this time about MS, maybe join TIMS to learn from patients how to deal with their concerns and issuebecause there is a human being on the other side of the catheter
then i would look for a seminar where this is taught, and hear from those with experience because people have already learned a lot
then i would really get to know my first patient very well, to make sure that person was courageous, knowledgeable and a true partner because there are political issues, etc that need support
Then i would get an IRB to avoid getting shut downbecause getting shut down is NO FUN and causes emotional distress for everyone and because we owe it to humanity to document and report the results and to protect patients
and share with administration because if they do not understand, they will never support this
then i would do my first case because there is a patient on the other side of the catheter
not a problem, MS_Hopedrsclafani wrote:I thought i answered this question, but cannot find the answer wo i will answer it again