This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Community: Knowledge & Support

Welcome to the world's leading forum on Multiple Sclerosis research, support, and knowledge. For over 10 years, This is MS has provided an unbiased community dedicated to Multiple Sclerosis patients, caregivers, and affected loved ones.
It is currently Mon Jun 17, 2013 11:38 pm


All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7801 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63 ... 521  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 28, 2010 3:47 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 2995
Location: Brooklyn, New York
pklittle wrote:
Dr Sclafani,

Thank you for giving me HOPE. I have SPMS and have been told by my doctor there is nothing that can be done, there is no effective therapy, and that the CCSVI theory is all wet. Now I am so thankful to be on your list, which I am sure is a mile long now.

Thank you for all you are doing!

Pam


Image


i hope we can rain on his parade some day


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 28, 2010 4:00 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 3:00 pm
Posts: 1273
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Dr Sclafani, You ROCK !!! LOL

I wish I could get on your list... but I am doing my best to get recognition for CCSVI in St Louis. I follow your posts with great interest.

ozarkcanoer


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 28, 2010 7:13 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 3:00 pm
Posts: 344
Location: Lexington, KY
Quote:
Marcia, i have a question for you. what is it like to care for triplets in the face of MS


Wow, that's a tough question to answer. My mantra since they were itty bitty is "Nothing to it just do it" repeated over and over again. Especially when feedings happened every 3 hours and took at least an hour to complete if I had help.

I cried last week when one of them asked why I couldn't take them for a walk and why I always say no when they want to ride their bikes with me. Seven year olds just blurt it out. They think I don't like them enough to do these things with them.

Maybe following recovery from a hopefully soon to be scheduled liberation procedure I can dust off my bike, fill the tires back up, and take a ride with them.

Thanks for asking,
Marcia

_________________
Marcia


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 28, 2010 9:31 pm 
Offline
Family Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 77
Location: San Francisco Bay Area, Calif.
Quote:
i am currently undergoing IRB review of a 200 patient safety trial in preparation for a larger randomized trial. The purpose of these research efforts is to give neurologists the evidence they want to refer patients for the liberation procedure and for insurers to be required to provide payments for these procedures.


Hi Dr. Sclafani. My question is: Will the 200 patient safety trial and the larger randomized trial provide testing and venogram procedures for all participants? In an earlier post you said it didn't seem feasible to do a placebo-controlled trial given the ethical considerations---so I'm wondering if everyone would get what you call the "Gold Standard"?

Hopefully your IRB proposal will sail through smoothly and get approved (not needing more revisions or rewrites)! Thanks for everything you're doing---hugs :D

Patrice


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: DHHS
PostPosted: Wed Apr 28, 2010 9:48 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 130
drsclafani wrote:
i do not think so, it is a hospital issue
momentum is growing

patience dear patients


Thank you Dr. S.! "Patience dear patients" made me cry! Compassion streams out of your words and gives such hope! Thank you ~ thank you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 28, 2010 10:02 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 126
Location: Greece
patientx wrote:
Is this another way of saying that in someone with CCSVI, the jugular veins don't open as much when lying down, compared to a normal person? If so, is this really a good criteria? In a person, couldn't the veins be open when supine and just not collapse when standing (or widen a little), still resulting in a negative delta?
It has to do with haemodynamics, i.e. for the veins to widen when sitting or standing there has to be a problem with the vertebral plexus and/or azygos vein or with the IJV's valves. So the criterion seems a good one.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 12:05 am 
Offline
Getting to Know You...
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 18
Hi Dr Sclafani
Thanks for all the time you take answering all our questions. It is much appreciated, I have followed this thread from the beginning, fantastic information for us all. My husband has PPMS, full time in chair. He has been tested and found to have narrowings in veins, LIJV 10mm down to 1.7mm and RIJV 6mm down to 1.4mm. Is it safe to fly or will this put additional pressure on the veins? What are the normal parameters for veins width? Cheers


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 2:48 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 532
Dear Doctor,

One of the usual complaints about the test in CCSVI is the lack of controls. Some of us were thinking that maybe a clinical trial could accept restenosis cases as control.

Would it be acceptable such a control case?

_________________
You can get a worldwide list of available sites for CCSVI at http://www.ccsviclinic.info


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 3:43 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 238
costumenastional wrote:
drsclafani wrote:
JOhnnybaby248 wrote:
It just keeps getting better and better more results out of Kuwait
http://www.ccsvikuwait.com/Details.aspx?d=4

Dr. S. any words of in encouragement


my only comment is......

when do we abandon ultrasound and MRV?

the incidence of abnormality in MS is so high, that it has become irrelevant to have a noninvasive tesst to screen. unnecessary cost and inappropriate to deny the gold standard to anyone.

I fear it is just a method to delay treatment.

only reason to do noninvasives is to get enough experience to use it for followup screening


just making sure everybody sees that.


I do not agree, in my case i had no Doppler because the venogram was clear (stuck valve in LJ) So...no scan in vertical position. I suspected that there was something wrong in the RJ which is confirmed by a Doppler a few weeks later.

Robert


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 5:29 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 2995
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Robnl wrote:
costumenastional wrote:
drsclafani wrote:
JOhnnybaby248 wrote:
It just keeps getting better and better more results out of Kuwait
http://www.ccsvikuwait.com/Details.aspx?d=4

Dr. S. any words of in encouragement


my only comment is......

when do we abandon ultrasound and MRV?

the incidence of abnormality in MS is so high, that it has become irrelevant to have a noninvasive tesst to screen. unnecessary cost and inappropriate to deny the gold standard to anyone.

I fear it is just a method to delay treatment.

only reason to do noninvasives is to get enough experience to use it for followup screening


just making sure everybody sees that.


I do not agree, in my case i had no Doppler because the venogram was clear (stuck valve in LJ) So...no scan in vertical position. I suspected that there was something wrong in the RJ which is confirmed by a Doppler a few weeks later.

Robert


Thank you. Well, did you have a second venogram that confirmed that problem on the right. And did you have a second treatment on the right yet?

Screening is always about finding a reason to treat or not treat. No need to do a screening test if there is always a reason to do the invasive more definitive diagnostic test at the time of treatment.

There will always be false negative results of every test. One case where ultrasound showed a finding that was missed on venography does not yet change my mind about my opinion. I wish i could see the venogram blinded (pun) to the results to see if i agree with the person who did the venogram

As i say, still lots to discover.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 5:33 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 2995
Location: Brooklyn, New York
frodo wrote:
Dear Doctor,

One of the usual complaints about the test in CCSVI is the lack of controls. Some of us were thinking that maybe a clinical trial could accept restenosis cases as control.

Would it be acceptable such a control case?


Interesting thought. As long as those who failed accepted no additional treatment. When one has a dramatic improvement that one loses during restenosis, would one be willing to not try again?

But thanks, larmo's army to the rescue again!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:23 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 238
drsclafani wrote:

Thank you. Well, did you have a second venogram that confirmed that problem on the right. And did you have a second treatment on the right yet?

Screening is always about finding a reason to treat or not treat. No need to do a screening test if there is always a reason to do the invasive more definitive diagnostic test at the time of treatment.

There will always be false negative results of every test. One case where ultrasound showed a finding that was missed on venography does not yet change my mind about my opinion. I wish i could see the venogram blinded (pun) to the results to see if i agree with the person who did the venogram

As i say, still lots to discover.


May 27th i will have MRI and Doppler, we'll see what pops up :wink: \
Then a possible treatment.

after 1st treatment (stent to open the stuck valve) i show some improvents, but the physical things like walking are very unstable..sometimes walking 12 meters by myself, most of the time very difficult to walk.....and i did not have the well known warmth.

i'm curious what the opening of the RJ will bring.

I'll keep you informed...

Robert


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:30 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 249
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Dr. Sclafani:

I know I've read the question before but am not sure if I've seen the answer.

If you have a bad vein on one side, say the left. Is it better to sleep left side up, or left side down (if you're a side sleeper)? Or on your back? Or does it not make a difference?

If it wouldn't make a difference, any insight as to why?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:53 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 2995
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Robnl wrote:
drsclafani wrote:

Thank you. Well, did you have a second venogram that confirmed that problem on the right. And did you have a second treatment on the right yet?

Screening is always about finding a reason to treat or not treat. No need to do a screening test if there is always a reason to do the invasive more definitive diagnostic test at the time of treatment.

There will always be false negative results of every test. One case where ultrasound showed a finding that was missed on venography does not yet change my mind about my opinion. I wish i could see the venogram blinded (pun) to the results to see if i agree with the person who did the venogram

As i say, still lots to discover.


May 27th i will have MRI and Doppler, we'll see what pops up :wink: \
Then a possible treatment.

after 1st treatment (stent to open the stuck valve) i show some improvents, but the physical things like walking are very unstable..sometimes walking 12 meters by myself, most of the time very difficult to walk.....and i did not have the well known warmth.

i'm curious what the opening of the RJ will bring.

I'll keep you informed...

Robert


Robert
i would love to see the first venogram if you could send me a copy of the pictures. I want to see if it is truly normal

i also do an intravascular ultrasound when I do the venogram, through a ultrasound probe i put inside the blood vessel. Perhaps it is more necessary that i have believed in the past

salvatore


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:59 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 2995
Location: Brooklyn, New York
hopeful2 wrote:
Quote:
i am currently undergoing IRB review of a 200 patient safety trial in preparation for a larger randomized trial. The purpose of these research efforts is to give neurologists the evidence they want to refer patients for the liberation procedure and for insurers to be required to provide payments for these procedures.


Hi Dr. Sclafani. My question is: Will the 200 patient safety trial and the larger randomized trial provide testing and venogram procedures for all participants? In an earlier post you said it didn't seem feasible to do a placebo-controlled trial given the ethical considerations---so I'm wondering if everyone would get what you call the "Gold Standard"?

Hopefully your IRB proposal will sail through smoothly and get approved (not needing more revisions or rewrites)! Thanks for everything you're doing---hugs :D

Patrice


i do not know details of all the trials. Some are non-invasive diagnostic trials trying to confirm association of ccsvi and ms. These do not generally involve the Gold Standard of catheter venography. others are therapeutic and include the diagnostic questions and the safety and treatment trials. They all have at least the gold standard. My proposal indicates that I do not absolutely require noninvasives but prefer it and am willing to use studies done elsewhere if they meet our standards. I am not aware of any trials that are randomized prospective treatment trials yet.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7801 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63 ... 521  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. DrSclafani needs urgent help

drsclafani

10

1505

Wed Feb 08, 2012 11:24 am

drsclafani View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. DrSclafani ASKS a question

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1 ... 6, 7, 8 ]

drsclafani

105

10997

Tue Jan 04, 2011 12:03 pm

Hooch View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. DrSclafani says thanks to an unknown person

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2, 3 ]

drsclafani

40

5143

Mon Mar 07, 2011 7:33 pm

Laurellynne View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. drsclafani isn't the only doctor with a March birthday....

Cece

12

1982

Sat Mar 26, 2011 1:29 pm

belsadie View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. types of narrowings of the veins (drsclafani quote)

Cece

0

1346

Thu Sep 23, 2010 1:51 pm

Cece View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


News News Site map Site map SitemapIndex SitemapIndex RSS Feed RSS Feed Channel list Channel list
Read hundreds of personal Multiple Sclerosis stories on Experience Project. Experience Project is an anonymous community where people connect through their life experiences, made by the same people who built This is MS. With over 30 million personal stories about every possible life experience, you can quickly find people like you!


Interesting: Secret Confessions | Dream Meanings | Ask Questions, Get Answers

Advertise on the premier multiple sclerosis forum